Cultural Climate change

It’s one of those bizarre headlines beloved of the Social Justice Warrior left: “White Nationalism Is Destroying the West.” I won’t trouble you to take you through the article itself; its content is predictably uninspired.

There are some signs, again, that the progressives at the NYT are not in control of their huddled masses. For one, single women. One, named Peisinoe, writes:

I’m tired of this paper’s tireless apologia and blind defense of Islam.

This piece, like all others, conveniently fails to mention other ‘minor’ events such as the impact of massive, predominantly male, Muslim migration has on the freedom and security of women. As this paper constantly act as if the vast majority of Muslim men support freedom and equality of women.

The article forgets small facts like the mass sexual attacks of Cologne, where over one thousand ‘refugees’ (mostly North African economic migrants, about one thousand) organized themselves to openly sexually molest and rape over 600 women during the new Year’s Eve party.

The fact the NYT never really provided decent coverage of that event, or on the systemic (and generally legal) violence against women in Muslim cultures indicates its high level of comfort with a certain level of misogyny. It will no dare speak against its preferred ideologies even when entire countries treat 50% of their population as sub-human due to their gender.

You are so concerned with defending Islam that you turn a blind eye to the fact these men do NOT want gender equality, and probably never will – it indicates how you also view women as deserving second class citizenship. We – our bodies, our intellect, our freedom – are simply collateral damage to your ideology of tolerance for a culture of intolerance.

This shows the increasing fracture on the left: women encouraged to lead a life of sexual profligacy and childlessness by the cultural commissars are now realizing they have been used. Perhaps they can serve as an example to the next generations. We wish Peisinoe well; maybe her quiverful of children can vote against pro-Islam politicians?

But more to the point is the argument made by one Tucson Geologist. First, we note that there is an explicitly Biblical requirement to care for creation. We prefer the KJV phrasing: “And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”

What this dominion means is further refined in Genesis 2: “When God placed the first man in the garden of Eden, it was to ‘work it and watch over it’. Adam was commanded to take care of the earth, to fill and cultivate the rest of it following after the example God had given him in the garden.” So we are called to be stewards of creation, meaning an environmental concern is not foreign to the Patriactionary.

In this light, we note what Tucson Geologist said: “I am supposed to care deeply about global warming and how it will adversely affect our environment in 100-150 years. But I am not supposed to think about how a large Muslim population will affect our civic culture in 100-150 years?”

And there is a logic so clear as to be breathtaking. As reactionaries, we aren’t trying to preserve the knowledge inherent in ancient ways of doing things. Rather, we are engaged in fighting Cultural Climate Change.

Use it on your favorite liberal this week!



Posted by on October 15, 2017 in Uncategorized


About Wonder Woman’s origins…

I had no idea, till I read this synopsis of a biography movie now playing in local movie theatres:

Even worse than I could have imagined…

I was right in my instincts to skip “Wonder Woman” this summer, and I’ll also be giving this prog agitprop, and any future versions of “Wonder Woman”, a pass…


Bilingual, Braille, gender neutral, handicapped washroom sign of the times


Gotta ask the boss, Christian edition.

If I attended AnonS’s church and were in his shoes, I’d not only be no longer interested in joining the men’s group; I’d be looking for another church; a real, Godly one.


In the discussion of Gotta ask the boss, commenter AnonS described a man up group he found via his local mega church:

Local mega church had a small group listing for a ‘radical men’s mentoring group’ that I emailed for more information about. This church is non-dom but quite conservative for the area; forbids female teachers and gives lip service to submission when it comes up.

The ‘radical men’s mentoring group’ send out an email that required the married men to get a signed permission slip from their wives in order to attend. I replied that I was no longer interested.

Based on what AnonS shared, I was able to find a link to the Men’s Radical Mentoring Mentee Covenant, which does indeed require the wife to give her husband permission to participate in the program (emphasis mine):

9. I discussed this commitment with my wife and she…

View original post 828 more words


Posted by on October 13, 2017 in Uncategorized


Is the Model UN a CIA Propaganda Tool?


And just like the Deep State is in bed with both public education and Hollywood (and nobody can tell me that ‘American Ultra‘ wasn’t pro-CIA agitprop for leftist stoners), Big ‘Defense’ is in bed with the entertainment industry, as much as they can get away with, though people are beginning to notice.

As for FDR, we now know the media did their best to shield the public from awareness of his wheelchair-bound condition as much as they could (same as they shielded the public from JFK’s philandering), so avoiding portraying FDR outright aided in that, though no doubt FDR was and remains a god to them, so that also explains why they portrayed him the way old movies like Ben Hur portrayed Christ… (And yes, I’m conflating the media and the entertainment industry, just as I conflate the Deep State and Big Business. Because they’re all tangled up in each other…)

Uncouth Reflections

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Yes, I’m talking about the high school extracurricular activity but waitasecond, hear me out before you click over to the most recent Naked Lady of the Week.

The GF and I were working our way through PARKS & RECREATION (funny show!) when we got to an episode that takes place during a high school Model United Nations conference. I started thinking about the Model UN and what an odd program it is. Kids pretending to be diplomatic delegates, negotiating in committees, and studying parliamentary procedure? Sure, I guess, but the whole thing strikes me as more than a little weird considering that 0.00001% of the population becomes a professional diplomat. “Yes, but the Model UN prepares them for the business world generally!” you may say. To which I respond, “Then why not just have a club where kids start their own business?” Anyway, maybe I’ve been…

View original post 1,117 more words


Posted by on October 13, 2017 in Uncategorized


If it’s considered alright to expose others to HIV, why is it wrong to expose others to tobacco smoke?

As you may have heard, in California, knowingly exposing others to HIV is no longer a felony:

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill Friday that lowers from a felony to a misdemeanor the crime of knowingly exposing a sexual partner to HIV without disclosing the infection.

The measure also applies to those who give blood without telling the blood bank that they are HIV-positive.

Modern medicine allows those with HIV to live longer lives and nearly eliminates the possibility of transmission, according to state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblyman Todd Gloria (D-San Diego), authors of the bill.

“Today California took a major step toward treating HIV as a public health issue, instead of treating people living with HIV as criminals,” Wiener said in a statement. “HIV should be treated like all other serious infectious diseases, and that’s what SB 239 does.”

So, if HIV is to be treated as a health issue, and as less of a big deal than it has been treated in the past, why is knowingly exposing others to tobacco smoke, such a big deal to progs, more than it ever was in the past?

I suppose it’s because their class don’t smoke, but do engage in HIV-risky practices, and won’t quit…

I remember Andrew Dice Clay riffing, back in the day, on San Francisco’s absurd hedonism on the one hand and Stalinism on the other:

All over the country, stop cigarettes, stop fuckin’ cigarettes. Up in San Francisco, the fag capitol of California, they passed a bill, you can’t even smoke in the street. They say it offends people. But it’s okay if you wanna butt-slam your buddy while waiting for the bus? You smack him in the face with your dick five or six times? Oh, this isn’t offensive. You can smoke a baloney pony, but not a fuckin’ Marlboro?



Advertisements from long, long ago — relationship savers edition

BoB shares some amusing old ads, that would not fly today. 🙂

bluebird of bitterness

View original post


Posted by on October 11, 2017 in humour, on the lighter side