It’s not a slip up, it’s a rare admission of the truth.
Category Archives: feral females
Let us consummate the revolution! [Guest opinion.] I am a nice-looking, youngish high-school teacher (of English, if you must know), and almost every year at least one underage girl will make it clear to me that she would like to have sex with me. Or would like to do whatever this generation says isn’t sex, but which my father’s generation thought was.
I always turn these sweet offers down. I am not eager to lose my job and never be able to work in any school system again except in Thailand. I am not eager to lose my family. I am not eager to go to prison. I am not eager to spend my golden years with neighbors who are warned that a sex-criminal crouches slavering in their midst. And I am not eager to be questioned every time there’s an AMBER Alert.
But I do wonder … I am forbidden by law to enjoy the company of these girls in ways that would be — well, at least not illegal — in just a few short years. This strikes me as age-discrimination. And not only that, but I am required by law to engage in age-discrimination.
The girls are encouraged by law to engage in age-discrimination, since they may cavort freely with lads their own age who may be just using them for rough exploratory purposes, whereas I am gentle and experienced. They are deemed wise enough and mature enough to choose young partners, and (unbeknownst to their parents) to obtain medications and devices to support their cavorting, as well as (also unbeknownst to their parents) surgeries should the medications or devices fail or be left forgotten at a girlfriend’s home. But the law wishes them to discriminate against me. Solely on the basis of their age, they are deemed not to be wise enough or mature enough to cavort with me.
Surely, this is a situation that cannot long endure in our discrimination-sensitive age. Love equality will surely make its force felt soon. Perhaps someone from the Cato Institute will take the lead. None of us is getting any younger. [Arnold Zeck] Ω
Spot on, and funny. The laws regarding age of consent are not reason-based but purely emotion-based.
Commentary at The Last Ditch:
Italy is on the verge of requiring employers to give their female employees paid leave for those days that the ladies are incommoded by their eerie, but somewhat regular, appointment with the moon.
I predict that once this becomes firmly entrenched in American society (by government regulation, of course), it will be only a matter of time — a short time at that — before workers refer to absent co-workers as having taken “a rag day.”
I further predict that it will be only a matter of time — a short time at that — before said workers will be fired for having said it. [Ronn Neff] Ω
And then, afterwards: demands for paid PMS leave, separate from regular sick leave, because it would be misogynistic to expect women to have to use up their regular sick leave time for PMS, of course. And if you disagree, you hate women; if you say it at work, you’ve created a hostile environment, and you’re fired.
Mike Kydd is the poor man’s Steven Galloway — not a famous author; not a professor-cum-department head, but rather a lowly, un-tenured instructor; not particularly powerful.
Yet Kydd and Galloway both have been brought to ruin by adult female contemporaries and former students with whom the men had a consensual sexual relationship that then retrospectively morphed into various misconduct complaints against them.
While the investigation report commissioned by the University of British Columbia in the Galloway case hasn’t been made fully public — making it difficult to know with certainty precisely what the findings were — Postmedia has managed to confirm many significant details about Kydd’s case.
Details at the link; all too typical a tale…
I don’t know why male profs keep foolishly having relationships with their female students, when over and over again, this sort of thing occurs.
Learn from what happens to others, idiots! And don’t repeat their mistakes.
P.S. I’m not victim-blaming here – if you think that, then you’re thinking like a feminist – but simply pointing out that, deplorable as the misandrist double standards are, one can avoid being victimized by thinking with one’s big head (and conscience) and not one’s little one. That’s all.
Surely not that surprising to us Red Pillers, but anyway:
Heterosexual women have fewer orgasms than men or lesbian or bisexual women, a study suggests.
The findings came from a study of 52,600 people in the US, exploring the “orgasm gap” between the genders and different sexual orientations.
The report in Archives of Sexual Behaviour revealed a “variety of behaviours couples can try to increase orgasm frequency”.
These include oral sex and manual stimulation.
The study, by Indiana University, Chapman University and Claremont Graduate University, showed the proportion of people who usually orgasmed was:
- 65% of heterosexual women
- 66% of bisexual women
- 86% of lesbian women
- 88% of bisexual men
- 89% of gay men
- 95% of heterosexual men
Few heterosexual women climaxed through penetrative sex alone, the report said.
The study showed that “of particular importance was incorporating oral sex along with other activities during a sexual encounter”.
There was a clear pattern between more oral sex and more orgasms in heterosexual women, lesbian women, bisexual women, gay men and bisexual men.
Only in straight men was no link detected.
Other behaviours linked to greater orgasms in women were:
Asking for what they wanted in bed
Praising their partner for something they did in bed
Calling or emailing to tease about doing something sexual
Wearing sexy lingerie
Trying new sexual positions
Talking about or acting out sexual fantasies
Engaging in sexy talk and expressions of love during sex
Assuming, as appears, that the sample size chosen was large enough, and the methodology of the study sound and valid, how might we interpret their findings?
One thing I noticed immediately, is how different bisexuality is between the sexes. In women, bisexuals are only 1% different in their overall rate from straight women in their rates of orgasms, and both far experiencing a clear difference from lesbians who report 20% more orgasms than bisexual women and 21% more than straight women. Whereas in men, bisexual men interestingly report only 1% difference from gay men, and both only a small amount of difference from straight men, the range only spanning a difference of 7%. We can easily conclude that bisexual men are essentially gay men who occasionally hit it with women, whereas bisexual women are essentially straight women who occasionally have flings with women.
So, setting aside the bisexual data, what can we make of the greater range of levels of sexual satisfaction reported by women, versus the much narrower range (one third the size) reported by men?
The key is looking at the behaviours linked to greater rates of orgasms in women, in the short list above.
They essentially boil down to two main things: communicating one’s desires to one’s partner (preconditions of which would be: having such desires in the first place, and knowing what they are and/or having a willingness to try out new things, not being too shy to talk about such, and caring enough about one’s partner to have a level of openness and communication between each other that one feels comfortable and natural in raising such subjects), and caring enough about one’s partner to enjoy engaging in behaviour, activities, and dressing up in ways that stimulate the interest and desire of one’s partner, and therefore doing such things.
From the foregoing, given church culture often, in the past, downplaying female desires (telling women that they ought not to care about such matters), and given feminism’s and churchianity’s encouraging women to misuse their sexuality as a weapon to manipulate men (don’t give him any unless he does things for you that you want him to do, from taking out the trash and/or washing dishes, not leaving the toilet seat up, voting for who you think he should vote for, etc.), rather than as a means for married couples to grow closer to each other and enjoy each other’s company, is it any wonder that straight women in our society report lower sexual satisfaction than everyone else? When even those who recognize the problem can’t help but tell women to keep using sex as a manipulation tool, as a reward for doing dishes, etc.?
Of course, the media spin it as all men’s fault; and if only we men could be more like lesbians:
“Damn men, keeping on screwing up feminism from working properly!”
Blah blah blah fishcakes…
So sayeth Canada’s Status of Women Minister Maryam Monsef (the prog Muslim woman and Trudeau Liberal cabinet minister who was not completely honest about where she was born, and when she found that out):
Of course, being feminazis, they don’t care about violence against unborn girls…
(BTW, since when the hell did PP ostensibly start caring about women ‘coerced into’ abortion? They usually leave blaming men FOR abortion to their feminist sisters on the so-con and evanjellyfish side…)