RSS

Category Archives: Brave New World Order

“control exactly what people think”

“undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. […] that is our job.”

 

First sign of obesity in Arctic people discovered after remote tribes exposed to instant noodles, pasta

Figures.

Related.

 

Polygamy will be legalized; traditionalist Christians will likely be the only religious group to oppose it

Remember the Law of Merited Impossibility: It will never happen, and when it does, you bigots will deserve it.


From the comments, we can see one group who won’t join with traditionalist Christians in opposing it:

And no doubt members of any faith which still accepts polygamy won’t oppose its legalization.

(As for other non-Western religionists: did they vocally join in opposing SSM? No. ‘Nuff said.)

Will trad members of The Tribe stick their neck out and join us in opposing it? As with the aforementioned commenter (and as he pointed out), their ancestors used to practice it; I doubt they care that much. And with their more liberal brethren like the author above making the case for it, they’re even less likely to get involved.

Other than some individual allies here and there, we’ll likely be largely alone in our opposition.

Same as we have been, mostly, in all the other culture war battles. (And Democrat-/Liberal-voting racial and ethnic minority Christians are useless, because notwithstanding their personal opinions, they never let such affect their continued solidarity voting for parties which most ardently fight on the other side in the culture war. So it’ll mostly be white Christians fighting the good fight, without even Моrmons on our side in this case.)

 

The new feminazi party line: denying women abortion is committing violence against them

So sayeth Canada’s Status of Women Minister Maryam Monsef (the prog Muslim woman and Trudeau Liberal cabinet minister who was not completely honest about where she was born, and when she found that out):

mm

Of course, being feminazis, they don’t care about violence against unborn girls…

(BTW, since when the hell did PP ostensibly start caring about women ‘coerced into’ abortion? They usually leave blaming men FOR abortion to their feminist sisters on the so-con and evanjellyfish side…)

 

#WhiteLivesDontMatter to #BlackLivesMatter activist

Naturally. (Hat tip.)

A Black Lives Matter leader has come under fire after arguing on social media that white people are “sub-human” and suffer from “recessive genetic defects,” and musing about how the race could be wiped out. In a Facebook post, Black Lives Matter Toronto co-founder Yusra Khogali went on a rant, arguing that black people are the superior race because white people posses “genetic defects” that make them lesser humans, according to the Toronto Sun.

“Whiteness is not humxness, in fact, white skin is sub-humxn,” she wrote. “All phenotypes exist within the black family and white ppl are a genetic defect of blackness.”

She continued explaining her theory, claiming white people are lesser because “[they] have a higher concentration of enzyme inhibitors that suppress melanin production. They are genetically deficient because melanin is present at the inception of life. Melanin enables black skin to capture light and hold it in its memory mode which reveals that blackness converts light into knowledge. Melanin directly communicates with cosmic energy.”

Khogali then proclaimed: “White ppl are recessive genetic defects. This is factual.”

Of course, black lives don’t matter to #BLM, either, except when taken by white cops; they completely ignore black-on-black violence.

They just hate whites, as we see.

 

Russell Moore is a Soros tool

Now I know why he’s against immigration restriction! (Hat tip.)

Russell Moore? He’s one of the leaders of the Evangelical Immigration Table, a Soros front group pushing for Obama’s immigration agenda.

Figures.

 

Paedohysteria and the bachelor photographer

I’m a bachelor. Single, and unattached at present.

I like to take photographs when I am out and about.

Today those facts, taken together, were the cause of a paranoid mother becoming paedohysterical.

I was at an outdoor Canadian winter festival, at a local park, taking pictures.

One picture I took was of a group of about eight children, perhaps ranging between five and ten years old, playing on a piece of playground equipment that had been temporarily installed for the festival.

After shooting my shot, I walked away, headed elsewhere.

Suddenly, a woman ran up to me and demanded, “Did you just take a picture of my children?”

I answered, “Well, I just shot a group of children playing; if your children were among them, then I suppose I did indeed photograph them!”, smiling, trying to be friendly and polite and show my non-malevolent intentions, though I had already realized she was in the grip of paedohysteria, and my efforts were likely in vain.

And I was correct, for she then asked me, “Well, what are you going to do with it?”

I resisted the urge to sarcastically reply, “Why, I’m going to rush home right now and furiously masturbate over it!”, and instead I said, “I’m going to look at it, just as I look at all of my pictures, of all the different things and/or people that I shoot; like all the other people and scenes I’m shooting today.”

She appeared mollified by my response, said “Okay.”, and then left.

But a few minutes later, after I had walked away, irritated at the encounter, when I got into a line to get something to eat and drink, I saw her ahead of me in the line, and she noticed me. Then, afterwards, when I was sitting down with my food, I saw her at another picnic table, watching me. Still paranoid. Shortly after, she got up and left with her brood.

The experience almost ruined my afternoon.

I’m sure her own damned paranoia probably ruined hers, too.

Everyone loses with paedohysteria.

Parents, especially mothers: don’t be paedohysterical.

Do you really want to automatically assume bad faith on the part of every single man you see, especially one with a camera?

Suppose I was a pervert: do you think I would answer honestly when you ask me what I’m going to do with a picture of your children? And since you can’t actually stop someone from taking pictures in public places – yet – wouldn’t you rather not assume the worst, since you can’t actually stop someone from doing whatever they want with a shot they’ve taken, in the privacy of their home? And how would your children be hurt by such a thing, anyway, especially if they don’t know?

What a terrible thing, to go through life paranoid about things entirely beyond one’s control.

If you want to do something constructive, I have a suggestion: band together with other parents to fight attempts by authorities to allow adults who decide they are of the other ‘gender’ to use the public gym changerooms and showers of the opposite sex.

Now that’s something worth fighting for – and it’s winnable, too!

And we’d all win!

To end on a positive note, at one point, I wanted to get some shots of some animals that were there for kids to go on rides, and I noticed an area roped off where other photographers were shooting; I asked the teenage guy guarding the area if I could go in and shoot; he asked me if I had kids that were in there, I said no. He hesitated for a moment, but then said, “Technically, I’m not actually supposed to; go, hurry up,” and let me through.

Thanks, bro, for not being paedohysterical (unlike your bosses); for assuming I was acting in good faith! 🙂

If there are enough common-sense guys like him, we can turn things around and make the West sane again! 🙂