Perfect fit

She’s a religious fanatic, an anti-Quebec bigot, she wants to abolish Canada Day, and she thinks Harper was worse than 9-11.

So of course Trudeau appointed her to “combat Islamophobia” and promote “tolerance and inclusion”!https://t.co/4J0wVBq1dv

— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 31, 2023

 

Police in England needn’t know English

(Hat tip: OK):

The Metropolitan Police in London is recruiting officers who are illiterate, can barely write English, and may have a criminal record in order to meet diversity quotas, it has been revealed.https://t.co/rX7E9ydGo4

— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) January 30, 2023

 

Gynocratic safetyism

This is another perfect example of the gynocratic safetyism that rules elite public space. Two women (3 if you count the lady on the phone) using the cudgel of “safety” to (try to) browbeat Rufo and the other guy into shutting up https://t.co/SQlhF1mKnc

— Lomez (@L0m3z) January 29, 2023

This interview, even more explicitly than the "Twitter Files" (bc Roth lacks the discreet rhetorical style of Twitter's lawyers to maintain plausible deniability), perfectly showcases the gynocratic safetyism that provides the moral and legal cover that undergirds Woke World https://t.co/FbjEnrZHIL

— Lomez (@L0m3z) December 4, 2022

They either feel ‘unsafe’ or ‘so tired, y’all’; these are the weapons they use to control public conversations / debates.

 

And none do now, so it will continue until then

It stops when governors and legislators have the courage to ban it through force of law and not before https://t.co/TZx8VYXKSi

— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) January 29, 2023

 

Yes

Child sex abuse should get the death penalty.

— Allie Beth Stuckey (@conservmillen) January 19, 2023

If you destroy a child’s life, your own be forfeit…

And:

No; no single people and only straight married couples should be allowed to adopt

If we’d implement both… Would be a good start…

 

Quebec taking dwindling share of immigrants to Canada, according to new data

They’re not idiots, unlike the rest of us Canadians:

Quebec controls the number of economic immigrants it takes each year and the province’s premier. François Legault, said in September that taking more newcomers would be a “bit suicidal” to Quebec’s culture and identity.

His immigration minister made clear the government won’t be boosting levels anytime soon.

“The federal government’s intention to significantly increase its immigration thresholds over the next few years is concerning. We reiterate that it is up to Quebec – and Quebec alone – to establish its thresholds for permanent immigration,” Minister Christine Fréchette’s office said in a statement, which the Post translated from French.

The minister said Quebec has to limit immigration to French speakers to protect the French language.

“Quebec, as a French-speaking nation, also has a duty to curb the decline of French on its territory and to ensure its protection. We have a responsibility to give all our newcomers the tools to thrive in French in Quebec.”

 

Makes sense

The two sides will be a state that ceases to enforce federal rulings and the federal government deciding whether or not to use guns to make them. https://t.co/X9QlTxCYag

— Upstate Federalist (@upstatefederlst) January 16, 2023

The developing gun law situation in Illinois is a good example of what civil conflict in the US will look like, when it happens.

— Upstate Federalist (@upstatefederlst) January 16, 2023

Think the Kim Davis situation in Kentucky but Kentucky refuses to allow the US Government to summon her or jail her for contempt.

— Upstate Federalist (@upstatefederlst) January 16, 2023

I take no position on whether or not this will actually happen, who would win, and whether it would be good or bad, but the question is what it would look like or who the sides would be. That's what it would look like and who the sides would be.

— Upstate Federalist (@upstatefederlst) January 16, 2023

The best thing for the federal government to do at that point would be to stand down, and the federal government absolutely would not stand down because then federal authority over the states is over.

— Upstate Federalist (@upstatefederlst) January 16, 2023

 

Ijit Tribal polisci prof doesn’t get it

Experts are not supposed to decide policy. That is why they are not policymakers. Experts advise policymakers, who then make decisions based on often conflicting information from various experts.

Please let me know if you need further clarification on this https://t.co/KeoWYDiG3h

— Returned Expat (@ExpatAftermath) January 11, 2023

Of course, our politicians all abdicated their role as policymakers when WuFlu hit, and we’ve lived three years now under rule by experts…

 

Rosie the Riveter refused to return home

what happened? pic.twitter.com/hprA7BzYkf

— 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐏𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 🇺🇸 (@creation247) January 6, 2023

 

Pornhub requires ID from Louisiana users to comply with state’s new porn law

Wow!

A rare victory for social conservatives, and it shows it is possible to use technology to keep young people away from at least some online porn.

But… A downside could be that, later on, progs use such control as precedent, to further restrict what can be said or done online…