RSS

Because of the U.S. government shutdown, Catholic chaplains in the military have been ordered to stop celebrating Mass on bases

05 Oct

Seems the Obama administration has taken advantage of the government shutdown situation to take potshots at Christians, Catholics in particular, by forbidding Catholic chaplains to celebrate Mass on military bases.

The U.S. military has furloughed as many as 50 Catholic chaplains due to the partial suspension of government services, banning them from celebrating weekend Mass. At least one chaplain was told that if he engaged in any ministry activity, he would be subjected to disciplinary action.

“In very practical terms it means Sunday Mass won’t be offered,” Archbishop Timothy Broglio of the Archdiocese for the Military Services told me. “If someone has a baptism scheduled, it won’t be celebrated.”

The Archdiocese for the Military Services tells me the military installations impacted are served by non-active-duty priests who were hired as government contractors. As a result of a shortage of active duty Catholic chaplains, the government hires contract priests.

Broglio said some military bases have forbidden the contract priests from volunteering to celebrate Mass without pay.

“They were told they cannot function because those are contracted services and since there’s no funding they can’t do it – even if they volunteer,” he said.

John Schlageter, general counsel for the archdiocese, said any furloughed priests volunteering their services could face big trouble.

“During the shutdown, it is illegal for them to minister on base and they risk being arrested if they attempt to do so,” he said in a written statement.

A well-placed source told me that a furloughed Air Force chaplain was threatened after he offered to forgo pay. The chaplain was told he could not go on base or enter his chapel offices. He was also barred from engaging in any ministry activity.

The source told me the chaplain was told that if he violated those orders he and his supervisor would be subjected to disciplinary action – with the possibility of being fired.

[…]

The archbishop said a priest at Joint Base Langley-Eustis was banned from officiating at the wedding of a couple he’d been counseling.

“The wedding could be on the base, but the priest can’t do the wedding,” Broglio told me.

[…]

I find it odd that the military was able to find enough cash to let their football teams play this weekend – but they can’t scrounge up enough cash for weekend church services.

“It’s a sad contrast when we can let a football game go on but we won’t let a priest go on base and celebrate Mass,” he said.

So in President Obama’s world – college football players are essential but Catholic priests are not.

Chris informed me that Ann Barnhardt has responded thus:

Yes, I saw that the Obama regime is threatening to arrest any priest chaplain who says Mass. Obviously, every Catholic priest chaplain should IMMEDIATLY go offer the August and Unbloody Holy Sacrifice in the most public way possible every single day and then force the Obama regime to either arrest them and physically drag them off the altar or sit down and shut up. Fix bayonets and CHARGE! No army ever won a war by cowering in fear.

Chris’ response to the above was:

I will forgive her her Catholic eucharolatory as her spirit is correct. I would hope that the Presbyterians and Anglicans would be holding daily service as well.

And if that is not allowed, if we are not permitted to pray, then it may be time to go full anabaptist and withdraw from Babylon. For if you cast out Christ, you cast out reformation of wrongs and preservation of the good.

I responded:

I agree, instead of whining about the State’s enacting this, it’s time for Christians to openly defy the State, and challenge it, come what may.

But that said, I find the Anabaptist complete separation from the State appealing at present, even though I wouldn’t normally, because I think we should avoid endorsing the Empire’s wars, and giving the Empire the appearance of legitimacy.

I’ve previously given my thoughts on chaplaincies here and here.

 

17 responses to “Because of the U.S. government shutdown, Catholic chaplains in the military have been ordered to stop celebrating Mass on bases

  1. dcalfine58

    October 5, 2013 at 2:53 pm

    Well at the very least, arresting priests ought to make it VERY clear what the administrations real opinions are. None of this differences of opinion nonsense, it will spell out in the most clear and unmistakeable terms that the Obama administration is anti-Christian

     
  2. seriouslypleasedropit

    October 5, 2013 at 2:56 pm

    I’m under the impression that this comes from a relatively innocuous source—the government fears being sued by workers for unpaid work. So, to avoid lawsuits, it forbids unpaid work.

    How that interacts with chaplains is obviously complicated.

     
  3. Will S.

    October 5, 2013 at 7:56 pm

    @ DCAF: Indeed.

    @ Seriously: Certainly, in litigation-happy America, that’s very possible, and I’m sure is part of the reason for this. Yet if so, surely they could make chaplains sign a waiver, stating they will not launch any future claims against the government for any unpaid work they do at this time, before they do said unpaid work. And the fact that they allow presumably currently unpaid officials to referee, coach, and run football games, makes me wonder, if they can do so without government fears of having to pay for unpaid work, then why the extra concern about chaplains?

     
  4. dearieme

    October 6, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    Having military chaplains is clearly a violation of the Constitution.

     
  5. Will S.

    October 6, 2013 at 4:09 pm

    Is it? Interesting! I’m an ignorant foreigner in such matters, as a Canadian, I’m not deeply familiar with the U.S. Constitution. But I can see how, if it is taken as an establishment of a particular religion as having semi-official sanction, then yeah, it could easily no doubt be taken as a violation.

     
  6. dearieme

    October 8, 2013 at 3:29 pm

    The problem with having a constitution codified in a single, short, hard-to-amend document is that people keep violating it all the time. It was an interesting experiment but it hasn’t really worked.

     
  7. Will S.

    October 8, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    Silly Yanks; never should have rebelled against your God-ordained ruler George III. 😉

     
  8. pukeko60

    October 8, 2013 at 11:08 pm

    Will, co-sign on George III.
    I think we should fight the imperial wars, by the way, because we should still have a British Empire. Unfortunately a series of traitors (Atlee, Smuts, Trudeau, Clarke and their liberal and socialist ilk) destroyed the empire. We used to be able to appeal to the Privy Council, and the Council and Crown could correct injustice.
    If the vote in Congress about the budget had occured in the commonwealth, the leaders of the goverment would inform the crown that they did not have confidence and supply of Parliament and a new election would be called. Much cleaner than using Park Ranges and SD troops during a “shutdown”>

     
  9. Will S.

    October 8, 2013 at 11:49 pm

    Indeed, Chris; our Yank friends would be far better off with our form of government; of course, I’ve always held that. 😉

     
  10. dearieme

    October 10, 2013 at 9:52 am

    “never should have rebelled against your God-ordained ruler George III”: well, apart from his being neither their ruler nor God-ordained, there’s a possibly true point lurking there. But whether it was wise to rebel or not, they did so successfully, so that’s that. The issue is the current Constitution: it has proved a flop. (That it made it impossible to abolish slavery without a murderous Civil War is evidence enough of that.) It might be wise to adopt a better one, and one that it’s easier to amend. But it seems to be viewed with a quasi-sacred reverence, though it’s just a bunch of laws written by politicians.

     
  11. Will S.

    October 10, 2013 at 10:04 am

    I will say this for the American Constitution: it did survive the Civil War, and unlike France, which is on their Fifth Republic (and Constitution) since abolishing their monarchy, America is only on the second constitution (if you count the original Articles of Confederation as the first, more or less).

    For a republic, America has been extraordinarily stable, notwithstanding the convulsions of the Civil War. I don’t know whether that’s so much due to how well its Constitution and laws work, or just the relatively cautious and conservative nature of the American people, compared to citizens of other republics. I’m inclined to suspect it’s more the latter, more a cultural inclination more oriented towards stability than in other cultures in other republics.

     
  12. dearieme

    October 11, 2013 at 6:46 am

    But in one sense the Constitution doesn’t work; when it’s found inconvenient it’s blithely ignored.

     
  13. Will S.

    October 11, 2013 at 9:55 am

    That’s true. Perhaps that’s the secret to its longevity. 😉

     
  14. alcestiseshtemoa

    October 13, 2013 at 12:27 pm

    So, how was the government shutdown?

     
  15. Will S.

    October 13, 2013 at 4:13 pm

    Was? I don’t think it’s over yet. (I live outside America, but far as I know, it’s still on…)

     

Leave a comment