RSS

Next Up: Polygamy

27 Jun

Zwinglius Redivivus

Or as Politico says-

Welcome to the exciting new world of the slippery slope. With the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling this Friday legalizing same sex marriage in all 50 states, social liberalism has achieved one of its central goals. A right seemingly unthinkable two decades ago has now been broadly applied to a whole new class of citizens. Following on the rejection of interracial marriage bans in the 20th Century, the Supreme Court decision clearly shows that marriage should be a broadly applicable right—one that forces the government to recognize, as Friday’s decision said, a private couple’s “love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family.”

The question presents itself: Where does the next advance come? The answer is going to make nearly everyone uncomfortable: Now that we’ve defined that love and devotion and family isn’t driven by gender alone, why should it be limited to just two individuals? The most natural advance…

View original post 166 more words

 

23 responses to “Next Up: Polygamy

  1. Mark Citadel

    June 27, 2015 at 5:13 am

    As far as I am aware, this is a satire piece by a ‘Conservative’ columnist, however this is not to say the Left has not openly already advocated for this. The key figure behind the first nation to embrace sodomite marriage in the Netherlands has said the next goal is multiple partner marriages.

     
  2. Will S.

    June 27, 2015 at 9:59 am

    It will come.

     
  3. infowarrior1

    June 27, 2015 at 10:09 am

    Those whom the God’s(God in our case) destroy they first make mad.

    -Ancient Proverb

     
  4. Will S.

    June 27, 2015 at 10:16 am

    Indeed.

     
  5. Peter Blood

    June 27, 2015 at 1:51 pm

    Pedophilia, bestiality, polygamy. Public sex. Orgies. Forced homosex. To refuse a sexual advance is a crime. S & M. Sex sex sex. MOAR SEX!

    It’s clear to me that God has give this society over to the madness.

     
    • Will S.

      June 27, 2015 at 3:28 pm

      Indeed, Peter. Very much so…

       
  6. infowarrior1

    June 27, 2015 at 8:42 pm

    @Will S.

    Its clear to me now that the entire west is under judgement. And every country that is acclerating towards madness is going to be destroyed.

     
  7. Eric

    June 27, 2015 at 10:53 pm

    No, the next thing is that Christians will become marginalized by being forced to wear some distinctive mark, and their businesses and churches blacklisted, and will start being (officially) forbidden to hold certain occupations.

    If anybody doubts this recall that fag marriage is now “a right seemingly unthinkable just two decades ago.”

     
  8. Will S.

    June 27, 2015 at 10:59 pm

    Revelation 13:16-18 King James Version (KJV)

    16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

    17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

     
  9. Will S.

    June 27, 2015 at 10:59 pm

    (Score = 20)

     
  10. Will S.

    June 27, 2015 at 11:00 pm

    Thus, the Number of the Beast = 666

     
  11. Eric

    June 28, 2015 at 4:08 am

    Will:
    I’m thinking though less the Mark of the Beast and more like being forced to wear/display crosses like the German Jews had to wear stars—as a way of singling them out for social ostracism and harassment; and laws forbidding certain associations with Christians, &c. These things are already happening, but they aren’t widespread and official—yet.

     
  12. Will S.

    June 28, 2015 at 6:52 am

    Ah, indeed. No doubt that will come…

    Already, people talk smack at workplaces about conservative Christians; it’s bound to get worse…

     
  13. oogenhand

    June 28, 2015 at 11:56 am

    An antisemite would say, serves you right for keeping kosher slaughter legal. It seems that Judeo-Christian cooperation in regard to religious freedom is very much a one-way street. Personally, ritual slaughter doesn’t bother me much, but WNs have the delusion that banning it would be the magic bullet against Jews and Muslims. As if they couldn’t simply fake conversion to Christianity.

     
  14. Will S.

    June 28, 2015 at 6:39 pm

    Pfft. Stupid, that.

    In Spain, during the Inquisition, they simply went underground. They’ll do it again, if need be.

    OTOH, secularized Jews don’t care about dietary laws, anyway. Presumably secularized Muslims feel similarly; secular Turks freely drink alcohol, after all.

     
  15. Eric

    June 28, 2015 at 11:17 pm

    It’s not hard to imagine it. When you see the way the Progs are able to run like a steamroller over the American culture—why not? They decided one morning that the Confederate flag needed to be banned and it was gone the next day.

    I have no difficulty at all seeing outright pogroms carried out in the US. Look at anything from paedohysteria to anti-smoking campaigns—not to mention foreign wars— you can see that the Progs can invent enemies out of whole cloth with no trouble at all.

     
  16. Will S.

    June 28, 2015 at 11:21 pm

    Scary prospect!

     
  17. oogenhand

    June 29, 2015 at 1:59 pm

    Yeah, and that was the reason for all those pro-circ reblogs: saying “!@#! you!” against WN stupidity.

     
  18. Will S.

    June 30, 2015 at 1:42 am

    Ah.

    Works for me! 🙂

     

Leave a comment