Fred Reed’s tale of “Topping from the bottom” (true adventurous types wouldn’t do “safe words“), or, as churchian cuckvanjellyfish call it, “servant leadership“…
oogenhand: Go Circumcise Your Vocal Cords, You Stupid Fucking Whore
The 96th Thesis: Frivorce Apologetics; Parenting Rules; Probably Because You Aren’t Preaching It
Adventures In Keeping House: True Love Exists
Dark Brightness: March 1 is quit twitter day (WS: But why wait? Pull the plug now!); Is the Pope Christian?
The Society of Phineas: When The Reformers Are Feminist, Abandon All Hope; My Life Is Far From Perfect
Free Northerner: Sperm is Cheap; Sparing the Rod
Throne, Altar, Liberty: Justin Trudeau’s So-Called “Social Justice”
Alan Roebuck: A Pact between Factions of Christendom?
Citadel Foundations: Abkhazia Outlaws Abortion
Hawaiian Libertarian: They Can’t Hear You
The Gods of the Copybook Headings: I’ve Got You Under My Skin
Kathy Shaidle: Hit Me Baby, One More Time
Blowhard, Esq.: Architecture Du Jour: Annie Pfeiffer Chapel at Florida Southern College; Scalia’s Sore Winners
(From here.)
Patriactionary 
ballista74
February 21, 2016 at 3:20 am
Thanks for the links.
oogenhand
February 21, 2016 at 6:02 am
Two notes:
1) LGTB against Islamophobia:
• 1a] If you define Islamophobia as hatred against everyone who identifies as Islamic (the equivalent of churchians, mosqians), or even everyone with an ethnic background that is largely Muslim (e.g. beating up Sikhs and Copts) than this is less square circle than it seems. There are quite a number of liberals like Irshad Manji and Tofik Dibi, and the ‘ally’ Fatima Elatik, who consider themselves Muslim. In that case they want to protect the ‘good’ while cracking down on the ‘evil’ “fundamentalists”/”extremists”
•1b] Christians in particular know there is lot of nudge, nudge… going on. Just like even, or especially, ISIS folk, do not consider rape of non-Muslim females to be fornication, they likely do not consider rape of non-Muslim males to be sodomy.
2) Women: A century ago it was received wisdom that women civilized men by marriage. Nowadays we consider that to be blue-pill. Red-pill received wisdom is that women are thug-chasing sluts. BUT…
…others complain that men have become wimps and weaklings. This makes thug-chasing sluttery a POSITIVE, forcing men to become masculine if they want to get laid.
So, women civilize men by marriage, and barbarize men by sluttery, therefore women correct men in the right direction in a feed-back loop.
Sanne
February 21, 2016 at 8:49 am
Hey, thanks for the link!
Will S.
February 21, 2016 at 12:17 pm
@ ballista, Sanne: You’re welcome!
@ oogenhand: re: #2: Women domesticate men; they do not civilize them. Men build civilization; it has always been thus. What women do, is smooth down men’s rough edges, help make them more fit for domestic, family, home life. As for thugs and cads, they’re thugs and cads, but not necessarily barbarians, unless in the jungle, or high Arctic, or something. They’re civilized, too, even if not ideal in behaviour.
Don’t let the feminists claim that term ‘civilized’ for themselves, and consigh men to ‘man-caves’, like we’re some club-wielding Neanderthals. “Ug go sit in Ug cave!’.
Civilization is for all of us, but as a point of fact, men are pretty much responsible for almost all of our species’ scientific, engineering, and technological advances over the centuries.
Anyway, all that aside… I take your 1a point about Irshad Manji and so on (and she’s a lesbian as well as an ostensible ‘Muslim’), but I think they tend to see all the refugees coming in as poor victims, not oppressors, except in specific circumstances, bigoted us to focus on such, etc.
I have no idea what your point is in 1b. I’ll say one thing, though: I’m appalled that Christians and progressives alike ignore prison rape in Western prisons; they just don’t care, some even joke about it. Jared Taylor of American Renaissance is the only person in the media to speak out against it, and he focuses mostly on the black-on-white aspect of it, which is idiotic, but that’s what AR does. But still, kudos to him for broaching the subject.
Will S.
February 21, 2016 at 12:23 pm
@ oogenhand: Ooh, like that rant you reblogged from elsewhere, about anti-circumcision women. I’m adding it.
Will S.
February 21, 2016 at 12:35 pm
(Not that I endorse everything he says, but the jist of it, that it’s men’s business, not women’s, is spot on.)
ballista74
February 21, 2016 at 12:55 pm
“A century ago it was received wisdom that women civilized men by marriage”
A common expression of female-supremacist doctrine (like what I discussed in one of the posts linked here), made manifest by tradition over the last 400 years. It starts by thinking of the men as lesser (sinful and depraved) and posits the requirement of acquiring “beauty” (because he isn’t beauty himself – aka deity) via marriage and the statement that he is “lost” otherwise if he does not submit to a woman (deity) by marrying her and following her lead.
Will S.
February 21, 2016 at 1:15 pm
Exactly, ballista, hence my response to oogenhand.
Women are good at building nests, and in domesticating men, they’re getting the men accustomed to living in their nests – nothing to do with civilization. But men must resist the idea that the house is exclusively hers, and that he’s only confined to the ‘mancave’. What rot!
Gerry T. Neal
February 21, 2016 at 11:24 pm
Thanks for the link Will!
infowarrior1
February 22, 2016 at 12:12 am
@Will S.
Patriarchy civilized society not women:
http://www.fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html
Will S.
February 22, 2016 at 12:35 am
@ Gerry: You’re welcome!
@ infowarrior1: Exactly!
infowarrior1
February 22, 2016 at 5:52 am
And the SJW males and females look like they have reversed sexual dimorphism.
Will S.
February 22, 2016 at 9:40 am
Indeed. 🙂
oogenhand
February 22, 2016 at 1:15 pm
@ 1b: I meant the bacha bazi e.a.
@ 2: You cannot deny jihad brides do incite ISIS warriors to greater “valor”.
@ circumcision: By threatening frivorce, rape accusations, or pressing DV charges women can do everything with a man’s penis or that of his son as they bloody like…
Will S.
February 22, 2016 at 1:24 pm
Ah, that:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi
No doubt that is so with jihad brides.
No doubt frivorce-threateners can, alas, at least to some extent.
Will S.
May 29, 2020 at 2:22 am