Q: Would five million Congolese have the right to move into Tibet if they wanted?
— Christopher (@JohnDryden85) March 23, 2023
A: Yes.
Open-borders libertarians are just filth. pic.twitter.com/KBgsRjVFvc
Never go full libertarian
23
Mar
Patriactionary 
The Tactical Hermit
March 23, 2023 at 4:14 am
Simple Jack
freemattpodcast
March 23, 2023 at 6:33 am
Y
freemattpodcast
March 23, 2023 at 6:35 am
YOU MUH MUH MAKE ME HAAAPPPYY!!
Will S.
March 23, 2023 at 9:14 am
🙂
fuzziewuzziebear
March 23, 2023 at 4:16 am
What a truly terrible idea! It’s cold in Tibet.
Will S.
March 23, 2023 at 9:15 am
Now, five million Tibetans in the Congo would be an equally bad idea.
electricangel
March 23, 2023 at 11:07 am
like that guy who insisted he had the right to go live with the bears.
Then he found out the bears had the right to eat him and his girlfriend. That was epic.
Will S.
March 23, 2023 at 11:10 am
“We can get food delivered!” 😉
Joel
March 23, 2023 at 10:23 am
Open borders libertarians start with public property that is not regulated by government. Abolish public property, then property is regulated by property owners.
Will S.
March 23, 2023 at 10:33 am
See, I partly respect the anarcho-capitalist mindset, because yes, in theory, no public property, no commons which illegals can enter and occupy, and thus, immigration would not be an issue.
But, so long as there are states anywhere, there is power, which as Mao noted, flows from the barrel of a gun. Since we don’t have private nukes, can’t stop invading armies / attacking militaries, by private means.
Therefore the state is needed, to protect one state from another.
Also, the idea of private nukes is absurd.
electricangel
March 23, 2023 at 11:09 am
Under the second amendment, the only reason the government can have nukes is that it is a form of arms that we, the people, are allowed to keep and bear. Of course, it’s hard to hold a nuke owner accountable. That’s where prudence comes in.
electricangel
March 23, 2023 at 11:10 am
In other words, O Canuckian Reactionary, under the second amendment I have the right to keep and bear nukes.
Will S.
March 23, 2023 at 11:23 am
OK, you try and enforce that; all the best. 😉
Joel
March 23, 2023 at 11:37 am
If we are talking nukes, we are dealing with a bigger problem than immigration. Are you satisfied with the status quo where Putin, Xi, Biden, Jong Il, and etc. are the only ones with nukes?
By the way, whatever you think of the Ukrainians, but they are sticking guns in the hands of conscripts with minimal training and the conscripts are effective in urban settings. The conscripts seem to be ineffective in rural areas, but can hold off professionals in cities. Russia can’t nuke territory that they want to inhabit.
Will S.
March 23, 2023 at 12:07 pm
I don’t want Iran, the Saudis, or any other Islamist nation having nukes; quite okay therefore with the status quo.
feeriker
March 23, 2023 at 10:25 am
Ideological lolbertardians are capable only of thinking in terms of abstractions, never in terms of the actual consequences to which their ideas would lead if realized.
Will S.
March 23, 2023 at 10:34 am
Exactly.