Oh look, the press is shrieking about incels again

04 Mar

17 responses to “Oh look, the press is shrieking about incels again

  1. feeriker

    March 4, 2021 at 9:27 pm

    I think I’ve reached the stage where I’d laugh myself sick if there were to be an “outbreak” of serial murders by incels.

    • Will S.

      March 4, 2021 at 10:17 pm


      Only trouble is they may come after us ‘Chads’ because we have ‘Stacys’ and they don’t…

  2. fuzziewuzziebear

    March 4, 2021 at 10:49 pm

    Feminists are worried because incels are pissed. I read the Anglobitch regularly and the thread is dominated by Toronto incels who are just furious. They are all immigrant but they won’t leave. This is what feminists get for playing bait and switch with men for decades. What did they think would happen?

    • Will S.

      March 4, 2021 at 10:51 pm

      Nobody ever expects blowback, when instead they always should!

      • fuzziewuzziebear

        March 4, 2021 at 11:27 pm

        For decades men kept eating the meals that feminists served up to them. They got a little to used to it. Now, they are getting some blowback and they aren’t prepared to deal with it. A lot of things are happening concurrently that is undercutting feminism. To begin with, marriage rates are falling, slowly but inexorably. That is a set back for feminists because women count on marriage as an option. Dating is bleak, because feminists wrecked all the venues to gain advantage for women. Women will only be able to find short term. Then, the transsexuals are making a laughingstock out of them. It will be interesting to see how it will all turn out.

      • Will S.

        March 4, 2021 at 11:50 pm


    • Mrs. Watcher

      March 5, 2021 at 1:17 pm

      “Feminist” is a meme.

      Some buy it, but humans buy all kinds of memes. The labels are generally deployed by people trying to wrangle them for shekels.

      I know people who call themselves Republicans.

      Your average “feminist” is a mere female living in the hell she experiences from the scorns she’s suffered. Men who take “feminist” seriously are playing into a media meme from the early 20th century–literally invented, as I understand it, by the nephew of Siggy Freud, a PR maven named Edward Bernays.

      • fuzziewuzziebear

        March 5, 2021 at 4:34 pm

        They are out there and they are pretty awful people.

  3. Will S.

    March 5, 2021 at 12:51 am

    Everyone joking about state-mandated gfs; they’ll all be trans! 😉

  4. fuzziewuzziebear

    March 5, 2021 at 4:02 am

    State mandated girlfriends and they’re trannies??? I don’t want to think about what the reaction to that would be.

    • Will S.

      March 5, 2021 at 11:05 am


      • fuzziewuzziebear

        March 5, 2021 at 4:32 pm

        Had that been tried, we would have a modern definition of beserker rage.

  5. Hun

    March 5, 2021 at 6:15 am

    This is not real. Fake terrorists, fake problem. Journalists are scum.

  6. freemattpodcast

    March 5, 2021 at 8:01 am

    When you created an enemy, you will find one

  7. Mrs. Watcher

    March 5, 2021 at 1:14 pm

    Just more eyeball grabbing hootchie coo to drive Big Data analysis of attention and reaction trends by elites wondering how to stay on top.

    From I-don’t-usually-go-to-Wikipedia-but-glance-here:

    [Guardian Media Group’s] core business is Guardian News & Media Limited, publisher of, and The Guardian and The Observer newspapers. Guardian News & Media was formed as Guardian Newspapers Limited in 1967, adopting its present name in 2006.

    The group has a portfolio of investments to help support its journalism.[17] They comprise:

    –Ascential: an international business-to-business digital intelligence and events business.
    –GMG Property Services: a provider of software, technology and design solutions to the property industry.
    –An externally managed investment fund.

    Guardian Media Group exists to support the core purpose of its owner, Scott Trust Limited: to secure the financial and editorial independence of The Guardian in perpetuity,[18] but in the 2011/12 year the group lost £75.6 million,[19] and for the three years up to June 2012, the paper itself lost £100,000 a day – leading Intelligent Life magazine to question whether The Guardian can survive.[20] In 2014, The Guardian launched a membership scheme, aiming to avoid introducing a paywall and maintaining open access to the website. As of 2018 this approach was considered successful, having brought more than 1 million subscriptions or donations, with the paper hoping to break even by April 2019,[21] a goal they achieved in May 2019


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s