Yes, and stop misspelling ‘fаsсіst’, too

13 Jul

Yes, because the Antіfа are соmmіеs, just as Stаlіn was.


13 responses to “Yes, and stop misspelling ‘fаsсіst’, too

  1. silentmick1

    July 13, 2020 at 7:17 pm

    Few know what Fascism is so tend to simply use the word as denoting something or someone they don’t like. It’s almost as meaningless as “racist”.

    • Will S.

      July 13, 2020 at 7:21 pm


      Best example of this isn’t even the progs; it’s the neo-cons calling Islamists ‘Islamo-fascists’.

      No, idiots; they’re not fascists; they’re just devout practitioners of the ‘Religion of Peace’, as Dubya falsely claimed it is.

  2. fuzziewuzziebear

    July 13, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    The problem with fascism is that it can’t be defined. Mussolini tried and failed. The one point that he was certain of was that it is populist.
    About Antifa, if Stalin were still around, he would be drawing up lists and scheduling them to be purged, with Lenin’s full approval.

    • Will S.

      July 13, 2020 at 10:10 pm

      Mussolini did define it by how he carried out: the marriage of state and corporate power; a total state, directing and controlling the economy but allowing private enterprise as long as acting in harmony with the state.

      Stalin purged everyone…

      • fuzziewuzziebear

        July 13, 2020 at 11:38 pm

        Mussolini couldn’t commit it to paper and he took the path to power as the editor of a newspaper.
        Speaking of Stalin purging, one of the people he purged was his private secretary’s wife. She had a big mouth. Stalin promised to find him a new wife and he never did. I have to wonder how the secretary kept it together. He was the one who passed the list to Stalin to sign off. Then, there is Semyon Budyonny, marshal. The NKVD came for him and he called Stalin directly. Stalin told them to back off. So, not quite everybody. I did hear that he was planning more purges when he died.

      • Will S.

        July 13, 2020 at 11:50 pm

        No doubt he was…

  3. info

    July 13, 2020 at 10:00 pm

    They will be the 1st corpses in the ditch too after the commissars are done with them.

    • Will S.

      July 13, 2020 at 10:12 pm

      Of course. No-one respects traitors, not even those to whom they are useful…

      • info

        July 13, 2020 at 11:20 pm

        If that person backstage others he may backstab you. Even the Great Khan had traitors even that of his enemies killed.

      • Will S.

        July 13, 2020 at 11:38 pm

        Yes, in olden times they often shot traitors of the opposing side after making use of them, because they figured they had already proven they can’t be trusted.

      • info

        July 14, 2020 at 11:35 am

        @Will S.

        Sounds like good policy.

      • Will S.

        July 14, 2020 at 11:44 am

        It makes sense if the reason people are betraying is purely opportunistic rather than principle; that is, if the war is not ethnocultural but ideological, e.g. over slavery.

        If someone has a genuine change of heart about something, though, killing them when they change to your side is foolish…

        All depends; I think a hard and fast rule is problematic.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s