RSS

Supreme Court decides in favour of increased abortion access in Louisiana, for stated reasons which are contrary to a previous ruling of theirs

29 Jun

Dreher (yes) reports and observes rightly:

The Supreme Court today, in a 5-4 decision, overturned Louisiana’s restrictive abortion law. Chief Justice John Roberts, the new Anthony Kennedy, provided the swing vote:

The Supreme Court on Monday struck down a restrictive Louisiana law that would have left the state with only one abortion clinic.

It was the first chance for a court reinforced by President Trump’s two conservative appointees to reconsider its abortion rights jurisprudence. But Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joined the court’s liberals in striking down the law, saying it was required by the court’s decision overturning a Texas law in 2016.

“The legal doctrine of stare decisis requires us, absent special circumstances, to treat like cases alike,” Roberts wrote in concurring with the decision. “The Louisiana law imposes a burden on access to abortion just as severe as that imposed by the Texas law, for the same reasons. Therefore Louisiana’s law cannot stand under our precedents.”

The question was whether Louisiana’s 2014 law requiring doctors at abortion clinics to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals unduly burdens women’s access to abortion. Practitioners have said it has proven impossible for most of the doctors to acquire the privileges, leaving only one eligible to perform the procedure.

It is almost identical to the Texas law struck down by the Supreme Court in 2016, which said the requirement did not have a medical benefit. Now-retired justice Anthony M. Kennedy joined the court’s four liberals to form a majority in what was its most important endorsement of abortion rights in 25 years.

Ryan Anderson puts his finger on the moral insanity of this moment:

Two years ago, Roberts signed the dissent in the 2016 Texas case — a dissent that said the majority decision “exemplifies the court’s troubling tendency ‘to bend the rules when any effort to limit abortion, or even to speak in opposition to abortion, is at issue.’” Today, only four years later, Justice Roberts has Grown In Office™, and has voted to uphold the abortion status quo. Good Catholic Justice Roberts.

Can anyone understand SCOTUS abortion jurisprudence? Can it ever be applied logically? I think it can, if you understand this principle: Pro-lifers must lose.

I first heard about the decision when a pro-life Catholic lawyer e-mailed it to me, saying, “We vote for Republicans to avoid decisions like this.”

Another Catholic friend messaged: “Welp, looks like I’m done with the GOP.”

More:

Another reaction:

Still another:

[…]

A conservative friend e-mailed this morning to say that he recently had an argument with his father about the Republican Party in the age of Trump. His dad said he was sticking with the GOP because “it all comes down to abortion.” Wrote the friend this morning, “That argument is null and void after today.”

[…]

The Supreme Court will defend the Sexual Revolution, no matter what.

[…]

Roe v. Wade will never be overturned. Civil rights laws will continue to be interpreted by the High Court to favor the Sexual Revolution in all its manifestations. We are no longer a socially conservative nation, and have ceased to be a Christian nation in any historically orthodox sense. The Christian leaders who told you to be cool, and trust the Republican Party and its judges — they were wrong. Maybe they meant well, but they were wrong. If you want to be a useful pawn for Conservatism, Inc., be my guest — but please stop deceiving yourself that this strategy is a winning one.

The game is rigged. Even normies are recognizing that now.

 

9 responses to “Supreme Court decides in favour of increased abortion access in Louisiana, for stated reasons which are contrary to a previous ruling of theirs

  1. feeriker

    June 29, 2020 at 4:10 pm

    “The time is now past to relate to the American regime as citizens.

    Christians must now relate to it as subjects, as we were in Nero’s Rome.”

    Dear God, folks, that’s been obvious for DECADES! If you’re just NOW realizing that, it’s no wonder Christians have been getting our arses handed to us in the culture war! Did most of my fellow Christians attend special ed classes in school and ride the little yellow bus to classes every day? They sure act like it!

     
  2. fuzziewuzziebear

    June 29, 2020 at 4:35 pm

    I don’t know what to think. It takes the thumbs up from four judges to hear a case. This month, they only had two to hear on Qualified Immunity.

     
    • Will S.

      June 29, 2020 at 4:39 pm

      Guess this was a priority, to ensure more dead unborn babies. 😦

       
      • fuzziewuzziebear

        June 29, 2020 at 4:56 pm

        I don’t feel so good. Bicarbonate of soda. Burp!
        Still sad.

         
      • Will S.

        June 29, 2020 at 5:01 pm

        Me too, bro.

         
  3. feeriker

    June 29, 2020 at 5:49 pm

    Can you imagine what Judgment Day is going to be like for the Supreme Black-robed Tyrants?

     
    • Will S.

      June 29, 2020 at 5:51 pm

      Brrr, would hate to be in their shoes…

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s