RSS

Women Attempt To Infiltrate Last Male Space: Autism

29 Mar

Funny. 🙂

I particularly like the infographic, “Degradation of a Fanbase / Hobby”.

 

35 responses to “Women Attempt To Infiltrate Last Male Space: Autism

  1. Dave

    March 29, 2020 at 2:41 pm

    Girls inherit the same autistic genes as boys, but their natural sociability masks it better. My spergy daughter is more likeable than her brothers (a tard, a sperg, and a full-autist), but popularity is a zero-sum game segregated by sex, so she’s hopeless against other girls.

    An easy way for her to score attention would be to hang out with the incel nerds at the local independent toy store. Women value sexual attention more than sex, and getting it from a lot of unattractive guys she’d never let touch her is better than nothing.

     
    • Will S.

      March 29, 2020 at 4:17 pm

      Yeah.

      But even ‘normal’ girls might enjoy the attention of autist guys, and so pretend to be one to hang out with them. You see this with ‘gamer girls’, not really interested in gaming, but rather being where guys are.

       
      • Dave

        March 29, 2020 at 4:40 pm

        Either way, I wouldn’t allow her to inflict such pointless cruelty on innocent gamer-geeks; it’d be like chaining up starving dogs and dangling fresh meat just out of their reach. I’ll find one man who knows what all the buttons on a scientific calculator do and pay him a dowry to marry her and knock out lots of baby nerdlings.

        Some people would prefer us nerds to stop breeding and go extinct, but then they’d have to go back to pencil and paper when their computers mysteriously stop working.

         
      • Will S.

        March 29, 2020 at 5:29 pm

        Yeah; people are full of praise these days for truckers, for getting our stuff to us, but what about the folks who design stuff and make sure it works?

         
      • info

        March 29, 2020 at 11:19 pm

        @Dave

        “I’ll find one man who knows what all the buttons on a scientific calculator do and pay him a dowry to marry her and knock out lots of baby nerdlings.”

        Heh. Although I think a bride price paid by the groom is much better for society as a whole. Since there will always be godless people it will disincentivize murder of their daughters as babies.

        And could prove to be a gauge for the provisioning ability of the Husband all other things like character and physical health being considered.

         
      • Dave

        March 30, 2020 at 1:11 am

        Unless the guy’s a broke-ass vagabond, I’m going to have to put some skin in the game as a guarantee that my daughter won’t divorce him.

        Bride-price only works if daughters are compelled to obey their parents and not just run off to the big city and be useless whores. Where women are free to do that, few get the chance because their parents abort them.

        The Bible says not to kill babies, but it also says that females must obey their fathers and husbands. One rule doesn’t work without the other.

         
      • info

        March 30, 2020 at 8:04 am

        @Dave

        “Bride-price only works if daughters are compelled to obey their parents and not just run off to the big city and be useless whores. Where women are free to do that, few get the chance because their parents abort them.”

        Agreed. However Traditional Greco-Roman societies and Indian/Chinese societies have those controls as you stated that would largely prevent that.

        But the Dowry has resulted in a sausage-fest in all those societies. As their daughters are mostly dead.

         
      • info

        March 30, 2020 at 8:10 am

        @Dave

        Dowries are especially a problem for poor Fathers who are too poor to give their daughters away in marriage.

        In spite of all the proper social controls.

         
      • Dave

        March 31, 2020 at 8:38 pm

        In other words, dowries are eugenic because they prevent poor people from reproducing.

        As for the sausage-fest problem, go visit that hill where unwanted baby girls are abandoned and collect some future wives for yourself and your friends. Oh dear, it looks like ultrasound put a stop to that!

         
      • info

        April 1, 2020 at 4:39 am

        @Dave

        “In other words, dowries are eugenic because they prevent poor people from reproducing.”

        Bride prices do the same thing. Only without the rampant murder of infants. Men without means cannot afford it.

        “As for the sausage-fest problem, go visit that hill where unwanted baby girls are abandoned and collect some future wives for yourself and your friends. Oh dear, it looks like ultrasound put a stop to that!”

        Well there you go. Ultrasound makes it harder to rescue children compared to Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece.

        Otherwise people who are willing to raise orphans would be able to rescue them.

         
      • Dave

        April 2, 2020 at 12:18 am

        Bride prices violate the law of supply and demand, because in any society that applies common sense in raising its children, beautiful virgin girls outnumber rich men by a wide margin. You may want the prettiest girl, but your parents threaten to disinherit you if you don’t score a chick with a nice dowry. They’d rather their grandchildren have rich genes than pretty genes.

        Her parents won’t mind paying the dowry because it shows off their social status, they want rich grandchildren too, and their daughters will not be getting a share of the inheritance.

         
      • info

        April 2, 2020 at 2:19 am

        @Dave
        If that is true. How was it sustainable in Ancient Israelite society?

        It certainly worked. As for rich genes. Its best passed on through the man than through the woman.

        Not to mention the downsides of such a thing in addition to homicide as babies:
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowry_death

        But then again about supply and demand. I think the large selection pretty virginal daughters for rich men may be true. But such a wide selection of women will also ensure that character becomes much more important.

        Why would we want incentives that allow for rich shrews to marry because of dowry?

        Plus poorer men will have a better chance of a wife and family because they arent dead. Likewise they are much less likely to cause trouble as a result of being married.

        Its better to invest in one’s sons to focus on getting wealth and accumulating the generational hoard over time rather than through such incentives that have many downsides.

         
      • info

        April 2, 2020 at 2:32 am

        @Dave
        On rich genes:
        https://atavisionary.com/free-book-smart-and-sexy-the-evolutionary-origins-and-biological-underpinnings-of-cognitive-differences-between-the-sexes/

        I recommend this book. Rich genes are best passed through the men. Doesnt seem to work via women as much.

        Could be wrong.

        But if Ancient Israelite society and a few societies like it demonstrate. What may seem like common sense to us may actually be blindness to possibilities.

        If it can work then it may be workable.

         
      • info

        April 2, 2020 at 2:45 am

        The other benefit of excess pretty women to choose from is that women like Amber Heard despite being pretty can be thrown to the curbside despite coming from a relatively wealthy or middle class family.

        As Proverbs 31:10 says a good wife is harder to find than rubies. When character becomes much more important.

         
      • Dave

        April 2, 2020 at 6:25 pm

        Wikipedia has an interesting take on this question:

        “Dowries exist in societies where capital is more valuable than manual labor. For instance, in Medieval Europe, the family of a bride-to-be was compelled to offer a dowry — land, cattle, and money — to the family of the husband-to-be. Bridewealth exists in societies where manual labor is more important than capital. In Sub-Saharan Africa where land was abundant and there were few or no domesticated animals, manual labor was more valuable than capital, and therefore bridewealth dominated.

        “An evo-psych explanation for dowry and bride price is that bride price is common in polygynous societies which have a relative scarcity of available women. In monogamous societies where women have little personal wealth, dowry is instead common since there is a relative scarcity of wealthy men who can choose from many potential women when marrying.”

        So it worked for the Israelites because they were a poor nomadic people eking out a living on rocky, scrubby land. In a society like ours, where capital crushes labor, not a chance.

         
      • info

        April 2, 2020 at 8:35 pm

        @Dave

        That really sucks. That means poor men will be definitely screwed if he has more daughters than sons.

        If Old Testament Law is any guide then perhaps the laws like a Debt Cancellation every 7 years and a complete Jubilee every 50 years when all ancestral property gets returned to their original owners, slaves were all freed and all debts cancelled.

        Prevents capital from assuming to much of an importance. And the Law also assumes the sustainability of the bride price until the coming of the Christ.

         
      • Dave

        April 3, 2020 at 12:19 am

        Capitalism screws the poor anyway because they have no capital and their labor isn’t worth much. Even if a poor man has all sons, no one’s going to pay a dowry to marry them.

        “Prevents capital from assuming too much of an importance” = abolishing capitalism. Which worked great in Cuba and Venezuela.

        Imagine a sport where there’s never a new season and the scoreboard never resets to zero. When one team amasses an insurmountable lead, the fans get bored and walk away.

        Imagine a sport where the scoreboard automatically resets to zero every five minutes. The game is literally pointless.

        So between debt slavery and communism, we walk the middle path of printing more money to pay interest on the money already printed until our present 23 trillion dollar debt is the price of a hamburger. Which is a debt jubilee of sorts except that the poor all need jobs RIGHT NOW because their EBT cards no longer work, and the market price of their labor collapses to almost nothing.

         
      • info

        April 3, 2020 at 12:32 am

        @Dave
        I dont think God commanded a debt jubilee unless it works:
        https://www.unz.com/mhudson/a-debt-jubilee-is-the-only-way-to-avoid-a-depression/

        https://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-bankers-take-control.html

        Unless its done creditors own everything or the economy collapses.

         
      • Dave

        April 3, 2020 at 2:25 pm

        ScienceDaily is spewing idiocy. Dowries cannot “cause poverty” because whenever one family pays a dowry, another family nearby receives one. And dowries obviously don’t impair marriage and procreation because Bangladesh is desperately over-populated despite almost no immigration.

        Bangladesh is poor because if its wealth magically doubled, the population would also double within 20 years and they’d be destitute and starving again. Malthus saw this principle at work in 1798, to which his peers replied “no duh”.

        I’m open to the idea of a debt jubilee, which is going to happen in any case because bills that can’t be paid won’t be paid. But it’ll have to forgive the biggest debts of all: Social Security, Medicare, and government pensions. Whatever benefits you were promised will be deeply cut, or paid in near-worthless dollars.

         
    • info

      April 3, 2020 at 12:44 am

      @Dave
      If poor sons dont marry that’s fine they at least have a chance to earn their way up and not get murdered in either system.

      Compared to making having daughters a financial liability and hence resulting in their murder in many cases. It is more unjust compared to alternatives.

       
      • Dave

        April 3, 2020 at 2:39 pm

        If, for whatever reason, daughters were highly-prized assets to their families, what makes you think people wouldn’t be aborting baby boys?

         
      • info

        April 3, 2020 at 8:53 pm

        @Dave

        People could be aborting baby boys because they are feminist. But Men as a group are an economically net positive. They pay the majority of taxes and make the majority of income.

        They could even serve as soldiers and the state pay can help support his parents and his family.

        Unless ideology gets in the way boys are generally too valuable economically and in other ways to murder.

        I don’t see how with the way God designed the sexes that your scenario will ever come to pass.

         
      • info

        April 3, 2020 at 9:10 pm

        @Dave

        If you look at the dowry death link it has been also linked to the murder of adult women.

        And the practice of groom kidnapping if dowry is unaffordable:
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groom_kidnapping

        The society that God designed under the Old Covenant has many ways of giving the poor a fair go. Debt Jubilees, Interest Free Loans for the Poor (Exodus 22:25). Being able to glean food from the fields(Leviticus 19:9; Leviticus 23:22 Deuteronomy 24:19-21) and Justice under the Law.

        This is why the stance that I have towards to dowry is the way it is.

        Now if the way men and women worked is reversed. And boys are being murdered because of some perverse incentive or that they are made a financial liability because of their sex.

        I would of course oppose whatever is causing that to happen.

        People shouldn’t be punished for having either boys or girls as children. It is unjust.

         
      • Dave

        April 3, 2020 at 11:39 pm

        Imagine a society where no pregnant woman needs to worry about the sex of her baby because a boy and a girl are of exactly the same value to her, and this equality holds for all social classes.

        Then admit that such a perfect balancing act is impossible, that parents will always have reason to prefer one sex over the other, and just outlaw abortion and murder instead. Ten years’ hard labor for the mother and anyone else who takes part in procuring or performing an abortion, and death for spousal murder, ought to be sufficient incentives to stop the slaughter.

        And if you lack the power to pass and enforce such a law, there’s no way your more ambitious schemes could ever come to fruition.

         
      • info

        April 4, 2020 at 9:40 am

        @Dave

        I only have prayer and spreading my ideas via the internet. As for the ambitious nature of my ideas. The fact that God’s Law is perfect. Also means that morally for the time in Ancient Israel is perfect.

        I have no objection to the way marriage is done in that theocracy whatever the costs may be to either sex. It was designed to be sustainable until the coming of Christ as I said before.

        I dont wish for said equality of value and cost as you mentioned in your comment But it seems better by comparison. And if its good enough for God its good enough for me.

        God will do justly and his millennial reign will be perfect.

         
  2. electricangel

    March 29, 2020 at 3:17 pm

    Too funny. One would wish they’d have no desire to join.

     
    • Will S.

      March 29, 2020 at 4:18 pm

      I know, right? Alas…

       
    • info

      April 2, 2020 at 2:34 am

      If its their way of getting Husbands unconsciously by attention seeking they should be directed to alternatives.

       
  3. info

    March 29, 2020 at 11:20 pm

    I am sorry. But I find her attractive. Yum 🙂

     
    • Will S.

      March 29, 2020 at 11:59 pm

      Oh, she is physically attractive enough.

      But her personality leaves much to be desired…

       
      • info

        March 30, 2020 at 12:30 am

        True that.

         
  4. Dirtnapninja

    March 30, 2020 at 8:36 am

    I have been around autistic children for decades. I guarantee you, this chick googled “autism in women” and simply parroted what she saw in a certain scientific american article on female autism

     
    • Will S.

      March 30, 2020 at 12:05 pm

      Yeah, that’d be my guess, too…

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s