Now they’ve invented “second-hand drinking”…

16 Jul

Seriously, they’re trying to make it a thing

Best response:

Well, yeah!

God gave you two hands; use both! 😉


19 responses to “Now they’ve invented “second-hand drinking”…

  1. c matt

    July 16, 2019 at 6:43 pm

    I totally support banning second-hand drinking – it makes the beer too warm.

    • Will S.

      July 16, 2019 at 10:20 pm

      Ha! Exactly! 🙂

  2. Cecil1

    July 16, 2019 at 11:01 pm

    I was just asked, when renewing my car insurance for MY vehicle, who I live with.

    I said it was none of their business and not relevant to the insuring my car as sole owner.

    The operator just answered its ‘something we have to ask now’, in case some else could use your car.

    No damn way.

    • Will S.

      July 16, 2019 at 11:14 pm


    • c matt

      July 17, 2019 at 4:06 pm

      Well, to be fair, they are insuring you based upon risk assessment. If you have teenage/young drivers living with you it is not completely unreasonable that they may take the car for a drive once in a while, with or without permission. I can’t say the question is not relevant to insuring the car, even if you are the sole owner. The other option is a named driver exclusion addendum (if your state allows it), where coverage for that specific driver is excluded.

  3. thedeti

    July 17, 2019 at 9:19 am

    Bullshit. The articles describe What we used to call “codependency”

    • thedeti

      July 17, 2019 at 9:23 am

      at least codependents were expected to take responsibility for their part in the relationships. Their parts being staying in relationships with them, not putting down boundaries, enforcing boundaries, and ending the relationship.

      Now, with “second hand drinking”, the “victim” has no responsibility at all. she (yes, she, because no man worth his shit would call anything like this “second hand drinking) just stands there and lets the drinker inflict all kinds of pain on her. She has no agency, she has no responsibility. She’s not an actor. She’s just “acted upon”.

      people need to start taking responsibility for their shit. These people are codependents and in a codependent relationship, BOTH parties bear their share of fault.

      • Will S.

        July 17, 2019 at 12:22 pm


    • Will S.

      July 17, 2019 at 12:22 pm

      Exactly. We don’t need a new word for it.

    • Will S.

      July 17, 2019 at 6:47 pm

      Frankly, I’m convinced the arising of this term is symptomatic of the universal mental retardation of the Millennials, who are so illiterate they never heard of codependency, and thought they were clever to ‘invent’ this term by borrowing from ‘second-hand smoke’, when all they show is just how stupid and illiterate they are…

  4. feeriker

    July 17, 2019 at 2:53 pm

    I always thought that “second-hand drinking” was when you sucked down drunk’s vomit (your own or someone else’s). Sounds like a rare enough event not to prompt any concern.

    • Will S.

      July 17, 2019 at 3:27 pm

      😆 😝

      That’s how musicians as diverse as Hank Williams Sr. and Bon Scott have died, choking on their own vomit while sleeping off a hangover. Not how I would wanna go…

      • feeriker

        July 17, 2019 at 9:04 pm

        I guess THAT would be an example of “second-hand alcohol” being a proximate cause of death?

      • Will S.

        July 17, 2019 at 9:16 pm

        I guess so…

  5. Days of Broken Arrows

    August 1, 2019 at 9:30 pm

    Actually, they’re right. Drinking causes people to act like idiots, which does affect others. People don’t own their behavior. It becomes “Sorry about your face, man, I was sloshed!” Drinking becomes an excuse to indulge in irresponsible behavior. For men that often means acting violents and for women it usually means acting out sexually.

    Doesn’t mean we should ban drinking. Prohibition didn’t work. But let’s at least look at this for what it is. Maybe you can drink responsibly, but odds are 3/4 of your neighbors can’t.

    • Will S.

      August 1, 2019 at 10:11 pm

      Yeah, but deti is right that we have an existing term, ‘codependency’, to describe that.

      It’s as if Millennials think they’ve just discovered the wheel, and had to give it a new name…

      And it’s NOT analogous to ‘second hand smoke’, wherein people breathe the same substance that others are smoking and so are directly affected, potentially (depending on concentration), by the same physically harmful effects that can occur from ingesting tobacco and filter paper and additives, etc.

      So it’s a dumb phrase, that doesn’t fit, because godless proggy Millennial journalists are incredibly stupid.

      • Will S.

        August 2, 2019 at 3:57 pm

        And have zero historical knowledge…


Leave a Reply to Will S. Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s