RSS

Has Chivalry Fled? (Article, May 1912)

16 Nov
Has Chivalry Fled? (Article, May 1912)

Gynocentrism and its Origins

The following article provides an example of a ‘threat narrative’ – i.e., in this case the threat that chivalry is departed or dying, thus putting women “in danger” in a myriad ways.

The ‘Chivalry Is Dead’ trope has been wheeled out by every newspaper and media outlet for the last two centuries, on a weekly basis. If romantic chivalry is taking hundreds of years to die then it must be the slowest death on earth!

However the intent appears not to report accurately on chivalry’s demise (which doesn’t appear to be valid), but to reinforce protection of it as an article of dogmatic faith; the more one feels chivalry is under threat, the more one protects and upholds the institution.

To be sure there have occurred alterations in the way gynocentric chivalry is acted out on the contemporary scene, but the basic convention is still very much alive.

The following…

View original post 17 more words

 
5 Comments

Posted by on November 16, 2018 in Uncategorized

 

5 responses to “Has Chivalry Fled? (Article, May 1912)

  1. Dirtnapninja

    November 16, 2018 at 2:00 pm

    They want chivalry? Lets give em chivalry. Real Chivalry. Chivalry was not about the wahmens. It was a set of warriors codes emphasizing courage, loyalty, piety and smiting the enemies of god. In real chivalry the muslim rape gangs would have been summarily massacred. The heretics running our churches burned at the stake. The traitors running our governments hung for treason. In real chivalry antifa shitheads would be sentenced to judicial combat to the death.

    In REAL chivalry women were protected as long as they remained chaste, loyal, humble, obedient and pious. Women who did not behave that way were considered to be whores.

    Lets bring back that chivalry.

     
    • Will S.

      November 16, 2018 at 4:31 pm

      Hear, hear!

       
    • oogenhand

      November 17, 2018 at 11:55 am

      “In REAL chivalry women were protected as long as they remained chaste, loyal, humble, obedient and pious. Women who did not behave that way were considered to be whores.”

      Ironically, that is exactly the excuse those Muslim rape gangs use…

       
      • Will S.

        November 22, 2018 at 11:05 pm

        So they do. And, as regards the girls who give themselves willingly to Muzzies, they aren’t wrong…

         
 
%d bloggers like this: