RSS

Now the CBC and CTV have removed the lying girl’s name from their stories revealing that she lied

17 Jan

The State:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/scarborough-hijab-attack-1.4487716

The private but converged Corporate:

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/scissors-attack-on-girl-in-hijab-did-not-happen-police-1.3759910

It’s funny that they think they can memory-hole the name of the girl Khawlah Noman and her mother Saina Samad.

Not in the internet area, MSM.

Advertisements
 

16 responses to “Now the CBC and CTV have removed the lying girl’s name from their stories revealing that she lied

  1. Will S.

    January 17, 2018 at 12:54 am

     
  2. Will S.

    January 17, 2018 at 2:38 am

     
  3. Roman Lance

    January 17, 2018 at 8:18 am

    I don’t why, but every time I see “hijab” I read “hajib”. I hope the heck hajib is an insult because that’s how I read it and will forever pronounce it.

    Screw being nice about it.

     
  4. Cecil Henry

    January 17, 2018 at 5:47 pm

    They have to go back. And we should send those who would welcome them along with them

    In 2018: it’s time to let diversity™ be someone else’s strength.

    Remigration 2018: https://i.imgur.com/MR7BiFi.jpg

    https://voxday.blogspot.ca/2018/01/trump-was-right-again.html

     
    • feeriker

      January 18, 2018 at 12:44 am

      They have to go back. And we should send those who would welcome them along with them.

      Yup. Those who are enamored of shithole people of shithole cultures need to be sent packing to the shithole countries from which those people came so that they can put their asses where their mouths are and actually live with what they claim to respect. I don’t think most of them would last 24 hours.

       
    • Will S.

      January 18, 2018 at 7:40 pm

      Yeah.

       
  5. oogenhand

    January 19, 2018 at 11:22 am

    Baa!

     
    • Will S.

      January 19, 2018 at 6:00 pm

      The girl is 11, you sick fuck.

      Not yet able to reproduce.

      The line should at least be clearly drawn between the two, and we will do so here.

       
    • Will S.

      January 20, 2018 at 12:04 pm

      Not posting your link, because it proves nothing.

      oogenhand, if you had said you wanted to marry said girl, it would be one thing; while I’d still find it absurd and appalling, I’d let it go.

      But not fornication with prepubescents.

      Drop the subject and return to your usual kinds of comments from the past, the many that we’ve allowed, and you can continue to participate here as previously.

      Let it go.

       
      • Will S.

        January 20, 2018 at 12:11 pm

        That link mis-represents the source it quotes; I found the original.

        We’re not going there, here.

         
      • oogenhand

        January 20, 2018 at 12:50 pm

        Sure. I’ll stop trolling. 😉

         
      • Will S.

        January 20, 2018 at 1:03 pm

        Thank you. 🙂

         

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s