RSS

Tech boyz’ sex club

04 Jan

{Yawn}

The rich are different.

They always have been.

We know that.

I suppose it’s perhaps amusing (and/or galling) to consider that those who are so ‘progressive’ at work are different in their personal lives, but again, always been the case with the rich.

(But then the same is true with harder leftists, for that matter; the trope of the girlfriend-beating antiwar hippie, as noticed in pop culture by e.g. ‘Forrest Gump’, exists for a reason.)

It also doesn’t surprise that those who were overlooked by girls / women in high school / college/uni, who are now so rich they can have as many as they want, do so.

Ms. Chang sympathizes with the women-folk in tech, of course, and blames men, patriarchy, etc.

I have no sympathy for them. If they go to these parties, they either know what they’re getting into, or at the very least, they find out soon, and they have a chance to bolt; surely, keeping one’s personal integrity is more important than keeping one’s career.

If not, tough luck; suck it up, buttercup.

You made your choice, now live with it.

I suppose less women will want to go into tech now, after reading this.

Can’t say I blame them.

Can’t say I really care, though.

Not my problem.

The rich are different.

They always have been.

Advertisements
 

16 responses to “Tech boyz’ sex club

  1. greenmantlehoyos

    January 4, 2018 at 6:47 am

    I will say that there was a brief shining moment in the Victorian era where the rich took a stab at either being respectable or at least looking respectable. Carnegie and Rockefeller were known to be reasonably upright personally in their day (before senility kicked in regarding Rockefeller and he went a bit peculiar).

    That being said that’s why being born rich used to involve loads of training in how to not straight up lose your mind once the abundance kicked in. Eton made every boy work as a servant for a reason.

     
    • Will S.

      January 4, 2018 at 5:23 pm

      True; everyone, rich and poor, felt social pressure to keep up appearances during the Victorian era; that was a good thing, indeed…

      Yes, the privileged need to learn to appreciate that they are indeed privileged, and that wealth isn’t merely their birthright.

       
      • info

        January 4, 2018 at 7:42 pm

        I think the sons of the privileged needs to be raised in the saddle so to speak. Learn hardship from a young age whilst learning also how to use their privilege effectively and efficiently.

         
      • Will S.

        January 4, 2018 at 10:02 pm

        Whatever I may think of his taste in, well, whom he has chosen to marry, it must be said that Prince Harry seemed to have learned some lessons from his stint in the army; he’s no longer a rich playboy gallivanting around the world in an endless party. Mandatory service for the privileged, such as military service, or Third World charity / relief work, is an excellent idea.

         
      • info

        January 6, 2018 at 6:26 am

        Unfortunately Meghan Markle is not even good looking and in most photos I see that her hand is over his. Indicating woman he decided to marry is the dominant partner in the relationship.

         
      • Will S.

        January 6, 2018 at 8:10 am

        She is three years his senior, which is a big part of why (that manjaw of hers indicates high testosterone, unsurprising, since she is a mulattress). Plus, despite his many girlfriends / flings, she’s said to have been around the block a lot, and that affects women more anyway.

        A disappointing choice, to say the least.

         
      • info

        January 6, 2018 at 8:47 am

        I think Harry’s choice of wife actually is a blow to the grandeur of the British Monarchy:
        https://colonyofcommodus.wordpress.com/2016/04/13/the-need-for-grandeur/

        An ugly divorcee wife who is manjawed who dominates the Prince of England. Not a good look. A beautiful wife who is a young virgin and who is submissive to her husband upholds the grandeur of the monarchy.

         
      • Will S.

        January 6, 2018 at 8:52 am

        I agree, but fortunately, since he’s so far down the line of succession, it’s not going to destroy the monarchy. But the tendencies, unchecked, will…

         
  2. info

    January 4, 2018 at 8:48 am

    On their other hand the real perversion takes place:
    https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/drag-queen-clubs-for-kids/

     
    • Will S.

      January 4, 2018 at 5:25 pm

      Yeah, well, now that we have public libraries allowing five-horned demonic drag queens to do storytime hour for kids, not surprising this sort of thing happens…

       
  3. Southern Man

    January 5, 2018 at 7:49 pm

    “I will say that there was a brief shining moment in the Victorian era where the rich took a stab at either being respectable or at least looking respectable…”

    LOL. I submit to you the Hellfire Club, frequented by our own Benjamin Franklin, among others. The rich and powerful have *always* done this sort of thing, since the beginning of civilization. There is truly nothing new under the sun.

     
    • Will S.

      January 5, 2018 at 9:43 pm

      That’s from the Georgian rather than Victorian era, but agree with your larger point; like I’ve said, the rich are different; always have been…

       
  4. feeriker

    January 7, 2018 at 5:03 pm

    surely, keeping one’s personal integrity is more important than keeping one’s career.

    Not to an ambitious feminist, who demands that she be entitled to both.

    I suppose less women will want to go into tech now, after reading this.

    We should be so fortunate.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s