RSS

Studies found that government recommendations actually led to increases in rates of peanut allergies

19 Jan

Figures

From the same folks who brought you the ill-advised wars on fat, eggs, salt, and more, another bit of food science goes in the trash: the war against peanuts. The Washington Post reports:

On Thursday, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases released formal, detailed guidelines for pediatricians and allergists.

The document, published in six medical journals, includes three separate sets of recommendations based on the level of risk an infant has for developing a peanut allergy. Those at highest risk are defined as babies with severe eczema — a skin condition where patches of skin become inflamed, itchy, red and cracked — or egg allergy or both. Those in the middle group have mild-to-moderate eczema. And those in the lowest-risk group have no eczema or food allergies.

The Post goes on to explain the reasons for this change in recommendations: research conducted by Israeli and English scientists on Jewish children in their respective countries, the findings of which were released in 2008. What took so long?

That’s not a rhetorical question. I would really like to know why it took eight years for the United States government to catch up to recommendations that became, for pediatricians and allergists up to date on their research, commonplace years ago.

The tale of peanut recommendations isn’t a standard indictment against the government’s usual slow-footedness or ineptitude—it’s actually malpractice that likely resulted in the illnesses and even deaths of American children. In the same Post piece on the change in recommendations we learn,

The number of American children with nut allergies has quadrupled in the past 13 years, and peanut allergies are now estimated to affect 2 percent of them. Most schools now ban foods with peanuts, and manufacturers are required to label major allergens. The soaring price of EpiPens, which are used to treat a severe allergic reaction and retail for up to $650 for a two-pack, has become a hot political topic.

In the report that led to these recommendations, researchers arrived at unambiguous findings: of over 4,600 Jewish children (of similar genetic makeup) who were exposed early to peanut products in Israel, only eight developed peanut allergies. Of almost 4,000 Jewish children in the UK who were not exposed early, 73 did. In its conclusions, the study’s authors wrote,

We demonstrate that Jewish children in the UK have a prevalence of PA [peanut allergies] that is 10-fold higher than that of Jewish children in Israel. This difference is not accounted for by differences in atopy, social class, genetic background, or peanut allergenicity. Israeli infants consume peanut in high quantities in the first year of life, whereas UK infants avoid peanuts. These findings raise the question of whether early introduction of peanut during infancy, rather than avoidance, will prevent the development of PA.

In other words, bad U.S. regulations likely caused more American kids to have peanut allergies because parents who followed them duly withheld peanut products from their babies — which in fact made their kids more likely to become allergic to peanuts.

[…]

So the next time you’re making a sunflower seed butter sandwich for your kid whose class is nut-free, or throwing down hundreds of dollars for an EpiPen—if your kid is one of the unlucky ones for whom those rules were made—thank Uncle Sam for, once again, making our lives less healthy and more expensive.

I’ve long thought it’s bizarre of parents to withhold exposing their children to peanuts, rather than getting their bodies accustomed to peanuts – as with many other things.

Think about vaccines: we expose our children to dead disease vectors, to get their bodies accustomed to the material and ready to fight it, in the event they get exposed to the real deal.

It is well-known that children raised on farms generally do not get as sick from exposure to certain pathogens as city kids do, simply because their bodies have already been assaulted by higher levels of bacteria, etc., and so are more immune to ill effects suffered by those lacking exposure altogether to such.

So why treat peanuts any differently?

Remember the old saying: what doesn’t kill you, only makes you stronger. It’s true.

Hey, westerners: want to have strong, healthy offspring?

Give them peanuts, shellfish, runny eggs, and such as soon as they can eat, and take them to visit farms as much as possible; let them go horseback riding, etc. Make this, or pad thai for them, from time to time.

Start them early on booze, at home, when they’re still young, so they don’t find it a ‘forbidden fruit’ later, and will have already learned responsible drinking by the time they can buy it for themselves.

Hey, if any of your kids die young, surely you can always make more. I’ve heard it’s fun. 😉

Advertisements
 

8 responses to “Studies found that government recommendations actually led to increases in rates of peanut allergies

  1. feeriker

    January 19, 2017 at 2:58 am

    In other words, bad U.S. regulations likely caused more American kids to have peanut allergies because parents who followed them duly withheld peanut products from their babies — which in fact made their kids more likely to become allergic to peanuts.

    The real takeaway from this is that there is a horrifyingly large percentage of the population that is so zoologically stupid that they follow government regulations to the letter, against their (and of course their offspring’s) best interests, and despite decades of evidence that government regulations are not only useless, but that many are actually HARMFUL when followed. These are people both incapable of critical thinking AND living as free and responsible adults. It’s a travesty that they’re breeding.

    Somebody choose some better parents for these kids before the ones that they have kill them through their own stupidity.

     
  2. Keoni Galt

    January 19, 2017 at 3:39 am

    Or………..

    …..you see how far the rabbit hole goes as an anti-vaxxer conspiritard, and you discover that the primary cause of peanut allergies is the use of peanut oil in a number of vaccines administered in the first 2 years of life…..

    “The number of American children with nut allergies has quadrupled in the past 13 years,”

    Wonder if that correlates with the changes in the vaccine schedule and the ingredients of said vaccines in the past 13 years….

    ….but that’s just crazy whackaloon anti-vaxx fever dreams of fake news from lunatics like that Hawaiian libertarian kook. lozlzolzolzol

    Aloha!

     
    • Will S.

      January 19, 2017 at 8:37 am

      Interesting, Keoni; never heard that about the peanut oil. Not sure what to make of it.

      I don’t believe in forced vaccinations; I incline towards parental choice in the matter.

       
    • feeriker

      January 19, 2017 at 9:03 am

      Makes perfect sense. Between the toxic compounds being added to vaccines (for no discernibly valid reasons) and the Frankenstinian genetic modifications being made to food sources, the human immune system has been under seige for at least 20 years. Increases in the number and severity of allergy cases cannot possibly be coincidental.

       
      • Will S.

        January 21, 2017 at 12:38 am

        It all might well be related…

         

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s