RSS

I knew Cruz was untrustworthy; turns out he’s a serial cheater

25 Mar

And Breitbart knew but sat on the story.

Hilarious.

So, so-cons who hate Trump, and until now loved the supposedly solid, evangelical Cruz, whatcha gonna do now? 🙂

Stick a fork in his candidacy; he’s done! 🙂

Advertisements
 
17 Comments

Posted by on March 25, 2016 in Uncategorized

 

17 responses to “I knew Cruz was untrustworthy; turns out he’s a serial cheater

  1. feeriker

    March 25, 2016 at 1:40 pm

    So, so-cons who hate Trump, and until now loved the supposedly solid, evangelical Cruz, whatcha gonna do now? 🙂

    Why, they’ll for him anyway, as will the evanjellyfish.

    Hey, they voted for serial adulterer Newt Gingrich – several times, not being the least bit put off by his sins. They also rejected the ever-faithful Ron Paul.

    Never underestimate the hypocrisy of these despicable pieces of shit.

     
    • Will S.

      March 26, 2016 at 12:14 am

      No doubt, while all the while castigating Trump for his opinion of women, while ignoring the same of their own heroes.

      Stupid spineless worthless hypocrites.

       
  2. electricangel

    March 25, 2016 at 2:37 pm

    I have to admit I laughed out loud. I had thought Trump would cut a deal with Cruz to nominate him for the Supreme Court in exchange for throwing him his support, but now, no. Thanks for the link, Will.

     
    • Will S.

      March 26, 2016 at 12:15 am

      Hey, EA, you’re welcome!

      It’s been more amusing than a movie, the Republican nomination campaign. Pass the popcorn! 😉

       
  3. Bee

    March 26, 2016 at 7:10 am

    Accusations are not proof. “let every fact be confirmed by two witnesses.” It may be true, but it is too early to tell at this time.

     
  4. A New Outsider

    March 26, 2016 at 7:16 am

    Well this is certainly interesting. Whether or not it is true, it does add another layer to the most entertaining election/reality show this year. Things can only get more funny from here.

     
  5. Socially Extinct

    March 26, 2016 at 8:27 am

    If Ted Cruz was smart about this, he would manipulate this into the kind of sinisterfavorable character trait that ends up making him look appealing, ala, his opponent.

     
  6. John Doe

    March 26, 2016 at 9:16 am

    Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

     
  7. Will S.

    March 26, 2016 at 9:27 am

    @ Bee: Did you read the link? The source is well known for breaking news about affairs; and the evidence appears fairly solid, and other news outlets seem to have had at least some of the same information yet didn’t act on it.

    Good enough for me.

    @ ANO: Indeed.

    @ SE: True. But he’s not that smart. 🙂

     
    • Bee

      March 26, 2016 at 4:24 pm

      The Biblical basis for accusations are two or three witnesses for each claim. Until we have at least two witnesses for at least one of these women you just have claims which may be true or may be false.

      I have read quite a bit about this since the story broke. I skimmed the linked article. Still no solid evidence from two independent sources. Rumors are not facts.

      Liberals often shotgun accusations; lots of similar claims are not “truth”.

       
      • electricangel

        March 26, 2016 at 6:10 pm

        Fair enough. Note that the witnesses are for trials, not public scorn.it would be great to see this standard everywhere applied. No more secret courts.

         
  8. Will S.

    March 26, 2016 at 9:39 am

    @ JD: Read the link; see the major cheating stories the Enquirer broke; tabloids are good at that kind of thing. And if you’d actually read our posts regularly enough, you’d see what I said about what I think about the Donald, here, instead of assuming I think he’d be a good president, just because I dislike Cruz. But no, you decide to insult your hosts. So, Baahammered you are (see our rules), and in fact this isn’t the first time you’ve obtusely misunderstood and/or insulted us; you’re not welcome to comment here any more.

     
    • feeriker

      March 26, 2016 at 11:21 am

      Amazing, isn’t it, the pathetic petulance that SoCons/TradCons resort to when their little bubbles are burst and their “heros” are exposed for the douchebags that they are.

       
      • Will S.

        March 26, 2016 at 1:58 pm

        Quite pathetic indeed.

         
      • Bee

        March 26, 2016 at 4:25 pm

        It is not about heroes, it is about the Biblical basis for facts and determining truth.

         

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s