SJW pretended to be black for years, outed by own parents

12 Jun

‘Transracial’, ha.

Yes; progs want us to accept homosexuals as they are because they claim they were ‘born that way’, claiming it to be an immutable characteristic like race, but then turn around and demand rights for ‘trans’, who say they were born the ‘wrong’ sex, and demand to be accepted as what they say they really are, rather than what they actually really are.

The hypocrisy is glaring, but none too surprising; typical prog dissonance…

Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar

View original post


Posted by on June 12, 2015 in America, race, The Decline, The Kulturkampf


14 responses to “SJW pretended to be black for years, outed by own parents

  1. ddswaterloo

    June 12, 2015 at 9:19 pm

    Status seeking and envy are what motivated this woman. See me as the underdog and victim–to absolve me of responsibility for my actions.

    If she had pretended to be a doctor, or an rich duchess at parties we would see through these actions quickly. And it would not be good.

    Same here. Underneath this is a lot of hatred for her identity and culture. Its sick.

  2. Lucius Somesuch

    June 12, 2015 at 11:09 pm

    Looking at her picture on the white–er, I mean, right– it’s fascinating how clearly there seems to be something ‘off’ about her. If this were a woman you met at a picnic, you might for that first second see her as normal, but then– something clicks, or perhaps fails to click. Beneath the superficial pale girlish wholesomeness, there’s something weirdly mannish, lumpen, overexcited about her look. Her smile is a grimace– there are black gapes yawning at both sides of her teeth. Her skin looks splotchy and aged, her eyes are dull and appetitive. She strikes me, at bottom, as having the look of one of those wives complicit with a husband who’s a sex criminal, maybe a serial child killer.

    Looking at her second self on the left– the craziness is absolutely there. Yet the craziness comes with a kind of conspicuous debauched glee. It’s the look of a lunatic who has “arrived”! The eyes and smile are smug, smirking, triumphant. It’s something like the look of “relief” one might imagine Satan to wear in Hell– the face relaxes at last, to find a place he can truly feel at home!

    ** footnote: It’s also interesting that in her black persona, the cleavage is OUT!!! I wonder if somehow, developing abnormally as a white woman, she internalized and fetishized this notion of the Sexually Liberated Black Woman. Actually, she must have– I can’t imagine she’d go through all this without it having a strident sexual component for her.

  3. Peter Blood

    June 13, 2015 at 12:16 am

    Someone jumping the Black Privilege gravy train. More to come, I’m sure.

  4. ray

    June 13, 2015 at 1:07 am

    Spot-on DDS. No reason to make any effort, or actually produce anything of aid to the world. Cause shit all she has to do is load up the Special Grievance WarWagon, ah where
    are my blackface pens? Where’s my Gay Pride shirt to go with my purple hair?

    She’s already a Privileged Citizen by virtue of her oppressed femaleness, but that ain’t EVEN enough to compete for victim-status with others. She wanted the trifecta Holy Female, Enslaved Black, and probly the LGBTQZXetc agenda as well.

    The horrible alternative to falsifying her pathetic, useless Self would be to accomplish something of merit, or — perish the anachronism — do something good for someone else? Not fake ideo-political good, which is just a front for egotism, vanity, and strokes from her fellow-Enlightened political chumplings, whose Great Dream is to be on the ‘inside’ of the DC rot. Yes they really do covet such horrors. Everbody lookit ME. Not enough to fake African heritage. She was a ‘Civil Rights’ leader, to boot!

    Hey, why have a hard and sometimes boring real life when you can have an easy, exciting, and very popular, fake life? With friends and strangers admiring you for your courage?

    Ah! New Amerika! The smell of blackface paint in the morning!


  5. Will S.

    June 13, 2015 at 5:07 am

    @ dds: Agreed.

    @ LS: Ah, yes! So, along with victimhood-seeking, a touch of crazy, plus seeking sexual liberation. All makes sense…

    @ PB: Yep. I’m also sure we’ll see more of it, as time goes by.

    @ ray: Combining status-seeking with a loathing of one’s own people. Win-win! (Or, lose-lose, really.)

  6. Mark Citadel

    June 13, 2015 at 3:49 pm

    I’m lost for words. You can only laugh at how mentally disordered leftists generally are. So she dresses up as blackface and is now a transracial transliar

  7. Will S.

    June 13, 2015 at 6:49 pm

    ‘Transliar’, ha!

    I think that’s an appropriate term for anyone who pretends to be something he or she is not. 🙂

  8. Will S.

    June 13, 2015 at 9:18 pm

    PuffedHo is giving the prog party line on why ‘Caitlyn’ good, ‘Rachel’ bad:

    “In attempting to pass as black, Dolezal falsely represented her identity. Trans people don’t lie about their gender identities — they express their gender according to categories that reflect who they are.”

    Nigga, please!

  9. infowarrior1

    June 15, 2015 at 10:23 am

    @Will S.

    ”“In attempting to pass as black, Dolezal falsely represented her identity. Trans people don’t lie about their gender identities — they express their gender according to categories that reflect who they are.”

    That same argument can be applied to sexual identity. Yet when it comes to their religious belief in equality(which is what trans-whatever is the result of) that argument somehow does not apply.

  10. infowarrior1

    June 15, 2015 at 10:25 am

    @Will S.

    Methinks this is Satan’s original sin that he sought equality with God. Isaiah 14:13-14
    B”ut you said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God, And I will sit on the mount of assembly In the recesses of the north. 14’I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.”’

  11. bluebird of bitterness

    June 15, 2015 at 12:39 pm

    Is the one-drop rule still in effect? If so, she might be proven black yet.

    When I was young (eons ago) I got teased a lot for my curly, kinky, frizzy hair. Nothing I did to tame it — ironing, setting on giant rollers, even chemical straightening — worked very well; as soon as the humidity rose, the curls, kinks, and frizz returned with a vengeance. I wish I had a dollar for every sympathetic friend who told me how sorry she felt for me because my hair was so curly. Some people jokingly (at least I think it was jokingly) asked if I had Negro blood in me (“Negro” being the acceptable term at the time, which gives you an idea how long ago it was). Racial dysphoria hadn’t been invented yet, or I might have been tempted to start identifying as Negro just to get them to lay off.

  12. Will S.

    June 15, 2015 at 5:10 pm

    @ infowarrior: It’s the usual prog consistent inconsistency…

    @ BoB: It’s funny; some people think that frizzy, curly hair is purely a black thing, as if whites couldn’t ever have the same. I don’t get that.

    BTW, it is me, or does the younger Rachel appear to have a flatter, wider nose than the older one? In the pic above, it looks so, which means in that regard, she is ‘whiter’ now. 😉

    Oh dear; there I go stereotyping again. Oh well! 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s