RSS

These women and others don’t want you to call them ‘plus-size’

23 Apr


Fair enough; but, except for the skinnier (yet big-bootied and big-legged) one on the left, I also won’t call them ‘curvy’ or ‘voluptuous’, as I would, say, Sophia Loren in her prime.

There are only five possible accurate descriptive words for them (again, except for the skinnier one on the left).

Two are descriptive relative to average body sizes: ‘big’ or ‘large’. These are very mild, gentle terms.

Two other terms are ‘overweight’ or ‘obese’, which are medical / scientific terms, devoid of moral judgment, purely based on body mass index and health / physical fitness considerations.

You know the other term; we all do, as do they, though they don’t want to admit it to themselves or others. 🙂

One can’t escape human nature, as much as progs would like to in some cases (while not in others).

Men will find attractive what they find attractive, and find unattractive what they find unattractive, and men and women alike will judge both men and women on their weight.

And regardless of what term one uses, fat is fat.

Period.

‘Nuff said.

Advertisements
 
25 Comments

Posted by on April 23, 2015 in The Decline, The Kulturkampf

 

25 responses to “These women and others don’t want you to call them ‘plus-size’

  1. Carnivore

    April 23, 2015 at 8:20 pm

    Fatties, although the one on the left is husky. I wonder if she squats.

     
  2. Will S.

    April 23, 2015 at 8:33 pm

    Exactly, that’s what they are.

    And yeah, that’s a good term for her. Her legs do look athletic, lol…

     
  3. feeriker

    April 23, 2015 at 11:25 pm

    Are the two in the middle leaning against the brick wall? I hope not, because it doesn’t appear that the wall is either thick enough or sturdy enough to withstand that kind of pressure.

     
  4. Carnivore

    April 23, 2015 at 11:53 pm

    OOOHHHweeeee, feeriker, you should see what someone like the following in high heels does to vinyl flooring….

     
  5. Sanne

    April 24, 2015 at 3:47 am

    If I were one of them I wouldn’t pose in these clothes (or the lack of those:)

     
  6. Will S.

    April 24, 2015 at 5:28 am

    @ feeriker: Ha! 🙂

    @ Carnivore: Yikes!

    @ Sanne: That’s because you’re modest and sane. 🙂

     
  7. Sanne

    April 24, 2015 at 6:33 am

    Thanks, Will! I wasn’t fishing for compliments, honestly:) They all look so young, it’s amazing how many young people are overweight nowadays. When I was at school, if you looked like this you were teased unmercifully.

     
    • Will S.

      April 24, 2015 at 5:25 pm

      @ Sanne: I know you weren’t; I was just being truthful, and rational. Unlike these deluded young women. 🙂

      @ Eric: Ha! 🙂

      Now there’s what a curvy woman looks like! 🙂

       
  8. Eric

    April 24, 2015 at 5:22 pm

    Their outfits look like they were made from the same piece of material…maybe a condemned circus tent?

    But just so Anglosphere men don’t forget what ‘curvy’ really looks like:

     
  9. feeriker

    April 24, 2015 at 7:17 pm

    They all look so young, it’s amazing how many young people are overweight nowaday

    Genetically Modified Food: the gift that keeps on giving.

     
  10. feeriker

    April 24, 2015 at 7:19 pm

    @Carnivore:

    Are those women in a church, and is that a baptismal pool in back of the stage?

    Oh, LORD … now my mind is beginning to envision things that my eyes can’t unsee! MAN, did you HAVE to post that pic???!!!

     
  11. feeriker

    April 24, 2015 at 7:21 pm

    @Eric

    I’m assuming, of course, that the woman in the pic you posted is from Northern or Eastern Europe. That can’t possibly be a Norteamerikana.

     
  12. Carnivore

    April 24, 2015 at 8:10 pm

    @feeriker – don’t know the details. Just did a google on ‘fattys in high heels’ and that pic turns up.

     
  13. Eric

    April 25, 2015 at 2:38 am

    Feeriker:

    Close: she’s from Italy. lol

     
  14. Sanne

    April 25, 2015 at 5:13 am

    “Genetically Modified Food: the gift that keeps on giving”

    Feeriker, and the habit to stuff one’s face while sitting in front of the telly/computer.

     
  15. Mark Citadel

    April 25, 2015 at 5:00 pm

    I remember reading an article once that suggested men were guilty of the thoughtcrime ‘transphobia’ if they refused to date a transgender man. Not if they refused to entertain the idea, but if they refused to actually do it.

    This is the end product of sexual egalitarianism. Men must be FORCED to date what they find unattractive, because honestly, what do they know?

     
  16. Will S.

    April 25, 2015 at 6:41 pm

    LOL, insanity…

     
  17. Eric

    April 25, 2015 at 8:32 pm

    The progs don’t really favor sexual egalitarianism: they favor sexual anarchism. They don’t want sexual equality with beautiful women; they want to destroy the concept of female beauty. Hence a hideous transgender slag like Bruce Jenner is actually worth MORE in the eyes of a prog than someone who looks like Federica Fontana; since Jenner represents a deconstruction of femininity.

    That’s what the progs are really all about: deconstruction of genders, not equality between them.

     
  18. infowarrior1

    April 26, 2015 at 5:42 am

    @Eric

    I would go further as equality of the sexes is destruction of the sexes. Through the nullification of Sex Polarity.

     
  19. Eric

    April 26, 2015 at 12:01 pm

    Infowarrior:
    Equality doesn’t necessarily eliminate polarity; if you mean equality before the law, in the eyes of God, &c. There could never be anything like total equality even then because each gender has its own intrinsic rights, properties, and prerogatives.

    Arch-femihag Andrea Dworkin pointed out on numerous occasions that achieving equality was nothing without the destruction of polarity. Once that is destroyed, gender becomes meaningless; which is what the progs/sexual anarchists really want.

     
  20. Will S.

    April 26, 2015 at 1:28 pm

    There are of course different flavours of feminists; some want complete destruction of all gender norms; others cling tightly to their conception of what female is, and these kind hate transgendered men who wish to identify as female.

    So progs and feminists are by no means monolithic.

    But one thing they all seem to agree on, is that they hate men.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s