RSS

Public schools telling 13-year-olds they can have sex and choose their own gender

12 Dec

Planned Parenthood, rather than teachers, teaching sex-ed to teens.
Supported financially by taxpayers, naturally.

WINTERY KNIGHT

Hillary Clinton and Planned Parenthood Hillary Clinton and Planned Parenthood

Yes, Planned Parenthood is involved. Fox News reports.

Excerpt:

Students at one northern California high school are learning more than just the birds and the bees.

Along with local area groups, some parents are irate that their children’s sex ed class at Acalanes High School in Lafayette is being taught by employees of Planned Parenthood without their prior knowledge. They are also fuming over the methods and materials being used, including a checklist that asks students if they are “ready for sex” and another worksheet that describes how to give and obtain consent, as well as a diagram that uses a “genderbread” person for lessons in gender identity.

“[Parents] are very concerned,” Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, a non-profit legal organization that is assisting the concerned parents, told FoxNews.com. “Planned Parenthood is not exactly the best when it comes to putting young…

View original post 317 more words

Advertisements
 

14 responses to “Public schools telling 13-year-olds they can have sex and choose their own gender

  1. infowarrior1

    December 13, 2014 at 4:06 am

    Quite telling that they saddle students with the sex liberty of an adult without the responsibility to go with it as well as treating them like children in other cases. Then they blaspheme the creation of God by denial of the fixed biological nature of sex.

     
  2. Carnivore

    December 13, 2014 at 8:00 am

    No, what’s telling is that parents are ‘dismayed’, ‘angry’ and they’ve ‘started a petition’. How about 75% or more of the students are removed from the high school? You’d see the tune change pronto if they would be forced to dump most if not all of the staff because there are no students. But, no, that would be too inconvenient. One parent would have to stop working or sending a child to a private school would impact the summer vacation.

     
  3. Will S.

    December 13, 2014 at 8:10 am

    @ infowarrior1: Indeed.

    @ Carnivore: Exactly. If only more parents would actually act on their anger and dismay, and remove their children from the beast…

     
  4. Sean

    December 13, 2014 at 12:57 pm

    @Will: The issue is that the parents can’t won’t do that. One of them would likely have to stay home to teach/care for the kids and you can’t have the newest iPhone then. Besides, which one would stay home? Mom’s too busy Wanting It All and Whoring For Workplace Attention to stay home and Dad makes too much. Granny’s in a home, Grandpa’s dead.

     
  5. maxsnafu

    December 13, 2014 at 2:58 pm

    Reason No. 1572 why you should NOT send your children to a public school.

     
  6. Hibernia

    December 13, 2014 at 6:23 pm

    They are not even trying to hide the fact that they wish to destroy girls now. Needless to say, any girl who follows their “advice” is damaged goods.

    #No Hymen, No Diamond.

    (For any spergs/libshites out there, I am aware that a broken hymen does not mean a girl is not a virgin, but the promiscuous women will get the message loud and clear).

     
  7. Will S.

    December 13, 2014 at 11:49 pm

    @ Sean: Alas. Well, then they only have themselves to blame, for not caring enough about their own kids’ welfare, when the State takes over and miseducates them according to prog prerogatives…

    @ maxsnafu: Indeed…

    @ Hibernia: Yep.

     
  8. Eric

    December 14, 2014 at 3:17 am

    I wonder what would happen if a 13 y/o girl in one these classes raises her hand and naively asks the question:

    Student: “You mean I’m free to choose how I want to express myself sexually?”

    Prog Teacher: “Absolutely!”

    Student: “That’s great! There’s this handsome 30-something guy next door, and he’s single but definite husband material!”

    Prog Teacher: “Well, we don’t mean THAT kind of freedom!”

     
  9. oogenhand

    December 14, 2014 at 6:30 am

    @Eric

    Brilliant!!!

     
  10. Will S.

    December 14, 2014 at 9:13 am

    @ Eric: 🙂

    Or, they’d say, “Ugogirl!”, while phoning the cops, so that she gets sexually corrupted and has her fun, while he gets all the blame…

     
  11. Eric

    December 15, 2014 at 12:51 am

    Will:
    And then forced to testify against him so he can rot in jail while some lesbians from ‘Protective Services’ are put in charge or her ‘deprogramming’ and ‘rehabilitation.’

     
  12. Will S.

    December 15, 2014 at 12:55 am

    Exactly!

     
  13. Will S.

    December 15, 2014 at 12:56 am

    Then she gets a column at Salon or Slate or the Atlantic, from which to bash men…

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s