DirecTV pursues the football-fan gay couple market

09 Sep

Chris and I have our friendly rivalry. Giants, Cowboys—you know the deal.

But we sure agreed on getting rid of cable, and upgrading to DirecTV with NFL Sunday Ticket. It’s the only way we can watch our favorite teams every week.

Sure, we still argue sometimes.

But we’re just like any couple, really.

Right; just like any other couple…


21 responses to “DirecTV pursues the football-fan gay couple market

  1. Will S.

    September 9, 2014 at 2:19 pm

    Reblogged this on Will S.' Culture War Blog.

  2. Eric

    September 9, 2014 at 11:36 pm

    I’m starting to become convinced more and more that most Americans are functionally retarded. There is something mentally wrong with the people in this country.

  3. Will S.

    September 9, 2014 at 11:42 pm

    This country too, Eric; I think the whole West has gone nuts, except for some eastern European nations.

  4. Socially Extinct

    September 9, 2014 at 11:59 pm

    Frankly, and this is not a popular or endearing sentiment in the US of A, but I think most male football aficionados harbor secret homoerotic urges. Just like most women I know who enjoy football openly admit to being drawn to the lumbering, aggressive male imagery of faceless tight pants and broad shoulders.

  5. Will S.

    September 10, 2014 at 12:03 am

    Well, them there players sure seem to like to hug each other when the ball is thrown. I know, it’s ostensibly to stop the other team from getting possession of the ball / making yards, but still, I’ve always thought, “How gay is that?” 😉

    • Socially Extinct

      September 10, 2014 at 12:08 am

      Haha, yes, the players are another matter. But spectators….yah !

      • Will S.

        September 10, 2014 at 12:14 am


  6. Lena S.

    September 10, 2014 at 12:37 pm

  7. Will S.

    September 10, 2014 at 10:39 pm

    LOL, precisely; alas…

  8. Eric

    September 11, 2014 at 8:21 pm

    Check out this story:

    And note it was a ‘conservative’ governor who signed the ban into law. The sense I got from the Court’s ruling is that heterosexuality is considered ‘abnormal’. What do you think?

  9. Will S.

    September 11, 2014 at 9:19 pm

    Well, I think it’s that they don’t want to be, ah, ‘heteronormativist’, as progs might say.

    A sad day for New Jersey; P.C. dogma trumps the rights and freedoms of patients to medical care of their choice / if minors, their parents.

  10. Eric

    September 11, 2014 at 10:24 pm

    And when they imposed Obamacare on the country, they assured us it wouldn’t be used to enforce political agendas—and they wondered why some of us were skeptical about that promise!

    • Will S.

      September 11, 2014 at 10:39 pm

      Never trust progs; they will lie through their teeth.

  11. Eric

    September 12, 2014 at 10:46 pm

    I pointed out in a comment on Yahoo that if the law were equally applied (which the fags say they want) then it also should be illegal for public schools to preach gay propaganda. After all, that would be an intention to convert people. Of course, it was soundly down-voted…

    • Will S.

      September 13, 2014 at 12:35 am

      No doubt.

      ‘Neutrality’ means what they say it means – i.e. prog dogma.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: