RationalWiki says we’re a ‘sexist’ ‘webshite’

18 Nov

We’re linked in this list. (Hat tip: Lena, via email.)

Apparently we provide ‘material that can be targeted by RationalWiki’s snarkful analysis’.

I’m quivering in my boots!

We’re not alone, from the manosphere and tradosphere; a number of other sites people who visit here will recognize are included, as well: Heartiste, Dalrock, Elusive Wapiti, Gucci Little Piggy, Hawaiian Libertarian, M3, Unmasking Feminism, The Spearhead, Return of Kings, Throne and Altar, and more…

Elsewhere on the list, one will find others visitors here may recognize: Mangan’s, Apocalypse Cometh, VDARE, Chronicles Magazine, Lew Rockwell, Takimag, The Reactivity Place, and more…

I’m disappointed, though, at all the worthy sites that they failed to notice. Hopefully after looking at our blogroll, they’ll find more people to hate!


Posted by on November 18, 2013 in Uncategorized


24 responses to “RationalWiki says we’re a ‘sexist’ ‘webshite’

  1. Sanne

    November 18, 2013 at 11:33 am

    Congratulations:) Well, the apostols of tolerance have been at it again…

  2. Will S.

    November 18, 2013 at 11:37 am

    Thanks! 🙂

  3. Sanne

    November 18, 2013 at 1:06 pm

    It should be apostles, of course:) I got it mixed with apostel and apostolic:) Sometimes it’s difficult to spell in a foreign language…

  4. Will S.

    November 18, 2013 at 1:16 pm

    No doubt, it may be. In any case, your English is far better than my Dutch! 🙂

  5. Sanne

    November 18, 2013 at 1:23 pm


  6. M3

    November 18, 2013 at 2:10 pm

    Congrats! What a fine list it is!

    In truth the list could be so much larger.. not sure if the irRationalWiki does very good research. They missed out on heavy hitters like Rollo and Matt Forney, and included Viva la Manosphere which pretty much is an aggregation site (that they could have used to fill out their list).

    In any case, i hope it drives more traffic. Bad press still = press = message spreads. Roosh even made note of it here:

    Feminists are not even safe on their own “mainstream” sites (yahoo/atlantic/salon) and are having to kill comments because a majority of society disagree with their views. They are more in line with our views, they just don’t have license to say it. We grant them that license by showing they aren’t alone and won’t be denied their voice.

    So drive’em our way Rational tards.. we love the exposure.

  7. Will S.

    November 18, 2013 at 2:13 pm

    Thanks – and same to you! 🙂

    Yeah, I was very surprised they missed Matt Forney.

    And their link to Sunshine Mary is to her old blog, not her current one, which is why I didn’t name her in the post. C’mon, hatas, update your links! Add all the other ones out there you missed! 😉

  8. Will S.

    November 18, 2013 at 2:27 pm

    For ostensible rationalists, they sure like to smear their opponents; e.g. COTWA and Register Her, who they consider ‘rape apologists’, and smear as such, not even giving the full name, Committee of the Wrongly Accused, since that would of course reveal that they’re smearing them. They apparently added them after the SPLC targeted them; not surprising they go along with SPLC lies…

    irRationalWiki, indeed.

  9. Bob Wallace

    November 18, 2013 at 2:48 pm

    I used to be a newspaper editor. There is no such thing as bad PR. Exposure is always good.

  10. Will S.

    November 18, 2013 at 3:18 pm

    Exactly! Welcome, BTW.

  11. infowarrior1

    November 18, 2013 at 6:36 pm

    Rationality is to Rational wiki. As to free thought on “Free thought blogs”

  12. Will S.

    November 18, 2013 at 7:11 pm

    Ha! Good point. 🙂

  13. Jehu

    November 18, 2013 at 7:56 pm

    Reality is sexist. It is racist too. But its sexism is seriously OVER THE TOP. The delta in intelligence between black and white is right around 1 sigma. But the deltas between men and women in things like strength, aerobic capacity, endurance, and the like are in the 2-3 sigma range. Think about that. To be equal in those attributes to an AVERAGE, 50th percentile man, a woman needs to be up in the 2-3 sigma range, somewhere between one in 50 and one in a thousand. There’s a reason no woman has passed the marine infantry officer training yet—a woman that exceptional among women probably has better prospects. To add insult to injury, Reality also appears to significantly shrink the variance for women at the high end too (and also at the low end, but let’s face it, nobody really gives much of a damn about that), so that women are seriously underrepresented at the highest levels of mental attributes too. Reality gives not a damn for your churchian notions of ‘fairness’. Neither does God 🙂

  14. Will S.

    November 18, 2013 at 9:25 pm

    Indeed. 🙂

  15. Thanatos

    November 19, 2013 at 2:26 pm

    These guys seriously don’t understand what a favor they’re doing us.In the intellectual realm, being thought of as a “sexist,misogynist,racist,violent fascist” is like having bullet scars,tear drop tattoos, or a felony conviction in the hip hop culture. All the thinkers that people REALLY want to mention were regarded as violent revolutionaries, scoundrels, or ne’erdowells in their day. That’s how the left of today first got its traction among the jaded intellectuals of times past. Their stale,bland,monotone, sanitized leftist culture produces a HUGE demand for sensationalist thrills. In describing us using the lurid,sensationalist terms they do, they present us as a feast of transgression to a mind starved of real intellectual meat and gravy or a randy lascivious whore begging to be fucked by every swinging dick in town.

    It’s a good thing they’re too dumb to ever realize their ambitions,or the entire world would be in a lot of trouble.

  16. Will S.

    November 19, 2013 at 5:52 pm

    We’re badass! 🙂

    And, we are truly the free thinkers, unlike the ‘freethinkers’, constrained by political correctness and progressive dogmas.

  17. Elusive Wapiti

    November 20, 2013 at 5:53 pm

    Just saw this…I am honored to be lumped in with such a fabulous club.

    The composers of the list appear to be Aussie, and affiliated with FSTDT.

    @ Jehu, yeah, reality needs to be banned lol

  18. Will S.

    November 20, 2013 at 6:02 pm

    Oh, them!

    It’s great, except I’m surprised we’re lumped in not only with neo-Nazis, but also some feminists. What? Didn’t they get the memo; progs are supposed to celebrate all feminists? 😉

  19. avengingredhand

    November 22, 2013 at 1:46 am

    I’m not on the list. I am deeply hurt. 😦

  20. avengingredhand

    November 22, 2013 at 1:48 am

    I love the part about how Laura Wood is actually Lawrence Auster pretending to be a woman.

  21. Will S.

    November 22, 2013 at 9:29 am

    I can understand your disappointment.

    Oh yeah, that’s hilarious! They have to believe that no woman could ever think like that, that all would surely be not that reactionary.

  22. Sanne

    November 22, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    It’s especially hilarious considering the fact that Lawrence Auster died some time ago and his site is now inactive, but may be they made the list while he was still alive?

  23. Will S.

    November 22, 2013 at 3:53 pm

    I suspect so, Sanne; I think they’ve added periodically to the site, but haven’t updated obsolete stuff, like links to sites that no longer exist, e.g. Sunshine Mary’s old site, not updated to her new one.

    Sloppiness or laziness on their part, I have to say. If it’s so important to them to compile lists of enemies, you’d think the least they’d do is stay on top of developments!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s