Man Finally Put In Charge Of Struggling Feminist Movement

16 Apr

I found this recently via a link at the Onion. It is rip-roaringly funny, written In the dark ages before Roissy’s blog had been around for at least a year.

Some choice excerpts:

“All the feminist movement needed to do was bring on someone who had the balls to do something about this glass ceiling business,” said McGowan

McGowan claimed that one of the main reasons the movement enjoyed so little success in the past was that the previous management was often too timid and passive and should have been much more results-focused.”You can’t waste time pussyfooting around with protests and getting all emotional about a bunch of irrelevant details,” McGowan said. “If you want to enjoy equal rights, you have to have a real man-to-man chat with the people in charge until you can hammer out some more equitable custody laws.”

“With a charismatic, self-assured guy like Pete pulling the strings, we might even see a female elected president one of these days,” said Nathan Roth, an analyst at the Cato Institute. “Finally, the feminist movement has a face that commands respect.”

All kidding aside, the article does bring up a critical point often cited in the Manosphere. The effects of Feminism have been so damaging to what women have really wanted (husband, children, family) that it must have taken a man to come up with it. As Hawaiian Libertarian has pointed out a few times, that man was probably named Rockefeller.


12 responses to “Man Finally Put In Charge Of Struggling Feminist Movement

  1. Will S.

    April 16, 2012 at 3:32 pm

    That is hilarious! And given the Rockefellers, and male mainline Protestant theologians and ministers who promoted egalitarianism, it is more truthful than the Onion writer realized.

  2. Phil

    April 16, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    Feminism was already being promoted by the late 1800’s by communists in Russia. Feminism was official government policy in 1920’s Soviet Union. Rockefeller didn’t create feminism.

  3. Will S.

    April 16, 2012 at 5:19 pm

    Of course he didn’t create it. But he bankrolled it, helping it gain influence in America.

  4. electricangel1978

    April 16, 2012 at 5:32 pm


    You might be interested in this article about Rockefeller. scroll to Page 108 where he talks about the Soviet Union.

    “For fifty years the Federal Reserve-CFR-Rockefeller-Insider crowd has advocated and carried out policies aimed at increasing the power of their satellite, the Soviet Union…

    What has been true in the past is even more valid today, Heading the parade to transfer technology and increase aid and trade with the Communists are the Rockefellers and the Council on Foreign Relations.”

  5. Charlie

    April 16, 2012 at 8:36 pm

    Totally off-topic:

    How do you pronounce hypergamy and hypergamous? I’ve only ever seen them in print. If I’m going to argue traditional sex roles, I should know how to pronounce key terms, methinks.

    HY-per-gam-ous? hy-PER-gam-ous? hy-per-GAM-ous?

    I’ve thought it was hy-PER-gamous and hy-PER-gamy for a while now. But I’m not sure.

  6. Svar

    April 16, 2012 at 8:40 pm



  7. samsonsjawbone

    April 16, 2012 at 8:52 pm

    I’ve thought it was hy-PER-gamous and hy-PER-gamy for a while now.

    It is. “Hypergamous” is like “anonymous”, and “hypergamy” is like “hypertrophy”.

  8. electricangel1978

    April 16, 2012 at 8:54 pm

    I’d go with hy-per-GAM-y (emphasis only on the gam [for those of us who are leg men])

    hiPERgamOUS? Isn’t that the long side of a triangle, Svar?

  9. Svar

    April 16, 2012 at 9:12 pm

    @ Samson and EA

    Stop ruining my pranks.

  10. Matthew

    April 16, 2012 at 9:40 pm

    Hergamous higamous,
    Man is polygamous.
    Higamous hergamous,
    Woman’s hypergamous.

  11. David Collard

    April 16, 2012 at 10:30 pm

    Interesting Matthew.

    The original read “woman’s monogamous”.

    Men have learned something in the last few decades.

  12. Bwana Simba

    April 19, 2012 at 2:58 am

    The plot thickens. Du du duhhhhh.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s