RSS

The Way

13 Dec

Tonight I went to see The Way, a limited-release movie directed by Emilio Estevez and starring his father, Martin Sheen.  I had been interested in The Way ever since, a month or two ago, I read an interview with Martin Sheen and Emilio Estevez about it in my local newspaper: Martin Sheen is a practising Catholic (unlike Emilio Estevez, who describes himself as lapsed, and his even wilder other son, Charlie Sheen, who has become as famous for snorting coke off pornstars’ asses as for his movie and TV career), and the idea to make a movie about a famous Catholic pilgrimage was his idea, which Emilio ended up taking over, casting his father in the leading role.

The story follows Sheen’s character, an eye-doctor from California who flies to France to collect the remains of his son (played in flashbacks and imaginary scenes by Estevez), who had passed away in an accident, while on the pilgrimage of the Camino de Santiago, also known as The Way of Saint James.  He decides to finish what his late son started, and sets off on the pilgrimage.  Along the way, he meets other pilgrims, and so, it’s a ‘road trip’ movie of sorts, though one conducted on foot rather than in vehicles.  (Those who don’t mind ‘spoilers’ can read a more detailed plot outline here.)

The movie was very funny in many parts, and sufficiently dramatic, to make for a pleasant two hours (it is that long).  I quite enjoyed it.

That said, I kind of wish it had been Martin Sheen rather than Emilio Estevez who had directed it, as it might have focused a bit more on faith, had a person of faith been the director.  Conservative film reviewer James Bowman (whom I think is either Roman Catholic or high-church Episcopalian; not quite sure, but definitely a Christian) didn’t like it, largely because none of the main characters really had any religious motivations for going on the journey (one thought it might help her quit smoking; another one wanted to lose weight and become fit; another was hoping to cure his writer’s block); moreover, the film took a New Agey tack, that ultimately, it didn’t even matter whether or not they succeeded in their various endeavours, that all that mattered was “the journey”, and there was little emphasis on other pilgrims, whom, one would assume, in real life, would mostly indeed be faithful Catholics doing it for reasons of faith.  Here and there, there was a priest on the journey, some people carrying large crosses, and of course, at the end, some scenes from the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela in Galicia (at the end of the journey).  But only one character appeared to have been particularly moved, emotionally and presumably spiritually, at the cathedral.

Still, notwithstanding its deficiencies, IMO, it certainly worked as a movie; greatly entertaining, and far more respectful towards religion than pretty much everything else coming out of Hollywood today.  And the good messages, of people helping each other bear each others loads (not so much physically, but psychologically), outweighed the negative New Agey slant, IMO.  Worth seeing in the theatre especially for the gorgeous scenery of the Spanish countryside; certainly worth seeing when it comes out on DVD / Netflix, eventually; an evening’s entertainment, anyway, and one which does, in spite of itself, provoke some wonder and amazement, at the devotion of those who would undertake such an arduous journey, voluntarily.

(Incidentally, this isn’t the first movie about the Camino de Santiago pilgrimage that this here Protestant has seen and enjoyed; last year, I saw a Québécois comedy called “Les doigts croches” (“Sticky Fingers“), about some Montreal gangsters forced to walk the pilgrimage in exchange for their share of the loot from a botched robbery.  It was funny as all get out, and also worth seeing for those who speak French or don’t mind subtitles, but it was far more secular in its tone than even The Way is; more of a fish-out-of-water, criminal escapade story than anything else.  I think, once The Way comes out on DVD and download, that it and Sticky Fingers would make for a great double feature, for anyone who can get their hands on both of them.)

Advertisements
 
14 Comments

Posted by on December 13, 2011 in culture, humour, movie reviews, spirituality

 

14 responses to “The Way

  1. squiznit

    December 13, 2011 at 6:08 am

    that looks like a good movie, will go see it now

     
  2. Will S.

    December 13, 2011 at 1:03 pm

    Hey, yeah, I certainly recommend it. Just don’t expect too much from it, and you’ll enjoy it.

     
  3. Matthew

    December 16, 2011 at 11:28 pm

    Bowman hated The Truman Show, which is the point when I stopped reading his reviews. Not because of an aesthetic criticism of the film, but because he didn’t like the story. Neocon.

     
  4. Will S.

    December 16, 2011 at 11:41 pm

    I have a love-hate relationship with Bowman. I get why he reacts as he does to movies, and follow where he’s coming from, and most of the ones he gives two stars, I will love as much as he does if I check them out, and most of the ones he gives only one star, I will also love, more than he does. The ones he gives no stars, I form my own judgments about, depending on the subject matter, and what his specific criticisms are. If they’re the sort of things I know I’d dislike, I’ll follow his recommendation and not bother seeing it. If I find them laughable and absurd, as you did re: The Truman Show, and as I did, for instance, with Inception, I’ll go see it anyway, and usually enjoy it, regardless.

     
  5. Matthew

    December 16, 2011 at 11:49 pm

    re: the two star movies, I agree, with the exception of foreign films, where my taste completely differs from his.

    I just now completely, accidentally came across his review of the 4th Alien movie:

    http://www.jamesbowman.net/reviewDetail.asp?pubID=331

    Which goes to prove my point. Alien Resurrection was a horror of a film, but he hasn’t gotten close to identifying why.

     
  6. Will S.

    December 16, 2011 at 11:56 pm

    Ah yes, I see he sees it through the lens of abortion and lesbianism and feminism (same as he saw the newer Star Wars movies through an anti-Bill-Clinton lens, seeing the dialogue as being a chastisement of Republican partisanship), rather than the main beef that any fan of the original series (notwithstanding its ‘ugogirl’ feminist archetype in Sigourney Weaver’s character) would have: that the series ended, properly, with the self-sacrifice in Aliens 3, and that ought to have been the end. Bowman is indeed the neo-con who can’t step outside himself.

    Or do you have some other specific criticisms in mind, which I may be missing?

     
  7. Matthew

    December 17, 2011 at 12:18 am

    Nope you got it. Some appreciation of Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s previous work and a discussion of how he was not the right choice for a director would have been nice. ❤ Delicatessen.

     
  8. Will S.

    December 17, 2011 at 12:20 am

    Oh, I loved Delicatessen, and though I missed Amelie, I liked Micmacs. But yeah, wrong guy for the job.

     
  9. Matthew

    December 17, 2011 at 12:22 am

    Amelie is technically good, but almost too cute to be allowed to live. I loved it, but hated it for manipulating me so well.

     
  10. Will S.

    December 17, 2011 at 12:24 am

    I didn’t see it, or A Very Long Engagement; nor anything of his before Delicatessen. Micmacs was fun, a lot like Delicatessen.

     
  11. Will S.

    December 18, 2011 at 3:28 am

    Oh, and I liked the Truman Show, too; so much I saw it twice in the theatre within a space of two days.

     
  12. Fr. John+

    December 19, 2011 at 5:28 am

    Your comment about a Quebecois movie and Speaking French, is an oxymoron. I’ve lived in Paris, and the South of France, and speak fluent French (among other European languages). The paysans of Quebec speak Quebecois… which is NOT French. lol

     
  13. Will S.

    December 19, 2011 at 7:52 am

    Ah, a linguistic snob. 😉

    Yes, Quebec French is derived from 18th century French that stopped evolving, or rather, evolved in a completely different direction from the French spoken in the motherland at that time. So there are many differences, in pronunciation and vocabulary, in colloquialisms, etc.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s