Author Archives: Svar

About Svar

Ride, Shoot Straight, and Speak the Truth

An Observation on Self-Righteousness

Around these parts of the net, the term “Christian” seems to be used rather lightly. Instead of being used to denote those of the Faith, it’s more often used as a way to be self-righteous even when the user of the word is anything but Christian.

Now, I’m not saying that I’ve never committed unChristian behavior. I’ve just not had the audacity or the gall to conflate my poor behavior with that of Christ. I’m not deluded or arrogant.

Another case of this will be where bloggers will actually think that their blogs are actually important in the grand scheme of things; they write one blog post that gets a few hits and now they think that they’re the next Thomas Fleming or Pat Buchanan, hah!


Posted by on May 26, 2012 in Sin, you can't make this shit up


Living Creaturely

Recently around these parts of the net, there was some confusion about the concept of race-realism and racial moderatism and whether or not those things are unChristian or even anti-Christian. I will cede that material reductionism of any sort is unChristian because, we as Christianfolk believe in transcendance and in a higher order above the created one. To reduce any group of man to mere biology lies about God and denies the power of Grace. That being said, even though we aspire towards the higher order, we still are creatures living within the created order and we have to deal with the complications that entail.

A while back, Thomas Fleming wrote an article on the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin Case.

Within the comment thread, commenter Gilbert Jacobi talks about his bleak situation:

The Trayvon Martin story touches me in many ways.  Some background: I live (have lived all my life) in an all black neighborhood.  By “all black”, I mean that when I go outside my door, I see nothing but African Americans.  There could be no Trayvon Martin situation here, because my world is all Trayvon all the time.  In fact, my situation is almost a mirror image of the one he was in; one could be forgiven for wondering (and cops have often asked me) what a lone, grizzled white guy is up to in a place where he seemingly doesn’t belong.  But, as I’ve learned when I try to bring up my unique vantage point to make an observation on race relations, white liberals reject my experience as merely anecdotal, and as for racists, they won’t trust anyone who deals with blacks.  I straddle the grey area, so to speak, between the white and black worlds.

Now the Martin shooting illustrates at least two of the problems that confront me on a daily basis: how to prepare for defense; and how to read the signs of a situation about to explode.

To carry or not to carry, that is the question that has always bedeviled me; without divulging whether I do or don’t go about armed, let’s suppose I am carrying a gun – am I not more likely to use it? Here is the conundrum as I see it: whites who go armed in all-white or nearly all-white localities actually have little need for the gun, but seem more prone to using it when they feel threatened; whereas a white in my situation has so many threatening or potentially threatening situations to deal with, a shooting seems almost inevitable. But since escape after a shooting, when the streets for literally miles in any direction are black territory, would be perilous, and simply ducking into one’s house is to lead the danger straight to one’s family, this militates against shooting. Hence, a gun seems to be almost useless in this context.

On the second point, if the instant mobs forming over Martin are any indication, how much longer can I survive, surrounded by people who may explode in anti-white violence at any moment?  Not for the first time, the analogy with those European Jews who continued to feel safe even as the Nazis drew up plans for their extermination suggests itself.  I don’t know how much of the Holocaust story is true and how much may be laid to Zionist propaganda, but the Wannsee Conference is factual, and if it can be imagined, it is a long way toward happening.  I’ve never had any trouble imagining myself in the scene from the Pawnbroker where Rod Steiger’s family is scooped up and bundled off for the camps in the middle of an idyllic country picnic.   And I have to say I thoroughly disagree with Pat Buchanan’s statement, in his current article, that Martin “had a right to be enraged” with Zimmerman.  When blacks account for 85% of violent interracial crime – for example, raping whites (women AND MEN!) at a rate of 17 to one over white on black rape – (see The Color Of Crime) whites must respond accordingly, and blacks must accept these consequences.  As I always say, the formula black power advocates chant: “No justice, no peace!”, has it exactly backwards. Those who will not live in peace, can expect scant justice.

That said, Zimmerman, let’s say, may not have handled the situation well.  But how many white people have the opportunity I have, to hone the assessment skills necessary for these incidents?  Because of where I live, I’ve become adept at quickly sizing up the intent, capability and intangibles involved in a black/white confrontation.  This takes years, constant practice, steady nerves, faith in God, and perhaps a dash of leftover youthful romantic illusion, not necessarily in that order.

Finally, the bigots and race-haters can certainly be stupid, but they have one thing right.  The onus is on blacks to prove they can be trusted.

In response to this comment, frequent commenter and Louisiana Catholic, Robert M. Peters has this to say to Jacobi:

Mr. Jacobi,

Your words:

“This takes years, constant practice, steady nerves, faith in God, and perhaps a dash of leftover youthful romantic illusion, not necessarily in that order.”

Ultimately it is about living creaturely in a created order, living “naturally” with the idiosyncrasies of other critters.  The antithesis of living creaturely is to attempt to live according to the abstract principles of liberalism, such as “all men and races are equal,” gender is meaningless, every language can convey all things equally, etc.

Getting along with chickens was learning to live creaturely for me as a little boy growing up in Louisiana.  It was dangerous to enter the chicken yard if you did not know your chickens: their moods, their gestures and their group dynamic.  One had to live creaturely with cows, particularly if there were a bull around.  It was not prudent to enter his domain if cows were “in heat.”  One had to learn to sense that; they do not wear signs.

Learning to live creaturely is how we get along in families.  My mother’s great grandmother was a Choctaw.  Choctaw women were known for “enjoying” skinning captives alive, burning them, disemboweling them, etc.  From time to time, when I came home from college, my father would warn as I came in the door “Your mama’s in a Choctaw mood.”  That meant that my “button pushing,” often but not always unintended, could bring disharmony to the household.  I would be held accountable for the disharmony although it was my mother’s Choctaw mood.

Learning to live, really live, and work among blacks takes the same creaturely awareness.  The same is, however, true in the “redneck” community in which I am embedded and which is, in part, embedded in me.  If one walks into a bar, just like walking into the chicken yard, one must “read” the clientele, particularly those one thinks to know.  A misreading can lead to a fight, a broken body or a trip to the morgue.

Although I live in the country, we have an informal neighborhood watch.  Most of us are armed to the teeth: conceal and carry, open carry, etc.  Louisiana is defend your castle and defend your ground.  None of us desire to kill or to be killed; but we are committed to defending not only our own home and hearth but also those of our neighbors.

Part of living creaturely is to develop an etiquette which allows one to hold the world at bay but to be prepared to extend charity.  The stranger who might venture onto one’s front porch (Very few real ones left!) is a potential threat to the household; but he is also as our Lord has taught us potentially in need of our charity and hospitality.  It is the mark of a civilized society to have developed the necessary rituals, i.e. lesson learned, internalized and lived out by having lived creaturely, to simultaneously hold the world at bay, i.e. keep the stranger from crossing the threshold of the household, while weighing the need to extending charity and hospitality and consequentially taking the risk to invite the stranger over the threshold.  Southern ladies of my mother’s generation had mastered this important ritual and the associate skills.  Liberalism has destroyed them and even made them taboo.

And that, in a nutshell is the Christian way of living within the created order amongst other men and creatures that differ from you. Race-realism, informed by Christianity not Darwinism or atheistic material-reductionism, is just a small part of living creaturely.


Posted by on May 23, 2012 in America, race, religion, spirituality, survival


Father Knows Best: I Thought It Was Wednesday Edition

Thomas Fleming: (In which the good Dr. backs up Manny Paquiao on gay “marriage” and completely pounds a leftist twat) (In which TJF talks about leaving this sinking ship of a country. The comments are very important and insightful) (Looks like another European nation has tried to give the EU a nice big “fuck you” but has been crushed by the BNWO. It is unfortunate.) (About our Clown-in-Chief’s “sudden” revelation about sods “marrying”. I really don’t like that prick.) (About Native Americans with blonde hair and blue eyes and all of the great benefits that they receive)

Patrick J Buchanan: (on how you guys are going to be screwed soon because of the how the Boomers are leaving the workforce in droves to suck the government teat. I’m going to get screwed as well, but a little later than you guys) (on how the demise of White America and the flood of Hispanic immigrants is going to cause the demise of the GOP. Read the comments to see Clyde Wilson’s hilarious opinion; just like him I fail to see how the death of the GOP is a bad thing)

Srdja Trifkovic: (The Serbian Dr. gives his take on the elections in his homeland) (“And screw the bankers”. Indeed.)

The Letters Amongst the Men of Chronicles:

Thomas Fleming: (I don’t get the point of this one. The other men shoud explain this to me)

Tom Piatak:

Thomas Fleming:

Clyde Wilson: (Chinese restaurants are now advertising in Spanish. The old Southern Curmudgeon is not happy.)

Thomas Fleming: (Thomas Fleming sees a silver lining in the cloud.)

Scott P. Richert: (About the deal with the Facebook stocks and how the Facebook business model will not work. Zuckerberg made a killing and a bunch of dumbasses got screwed. Well, you know what P.T. Barnum said: “there’s a sucker born every minute”)

Thomas Fleming: (In this one, TJF says basically the same thing my father did about the new Facebook stocks: whoever buys that shit is a fucking moron; Facebook doesn’t even sell a product. My father also went on to tell me how useless Facebook is and how it’s just crap. I thought to myself, “but then how will all the frauen attention-whore?”)

Aaron D. Wolf:

Tom Piatak:

Aaron D. Wolf: (In this one, Aaron D. Wolf notices teenagers like me being glued to their smart phones. He notes that only a few years ago these teenagers would have been fighting and yelling. But he also notes that this change, the newfound docility is not a change for the better. Wonder why.)


Posted by on May 22, 2012 in Linklove


Svar’s Law of Democracy

“The problem with democracy is that the people get the leaders that they deserve not the ones that they need.”

I’ve recently had the epiphany that the people are as stupid as the leaders that they elect; that’s why they keep electing stupid leaders. I came to this realization when I was talking about the Presidential elections with my father and we were debating who sucks more, Obama or Mormon Obama. It was inconclusive.

This is why I’ll never vote.


Posted by on April 22, 2012 in America, government



This old article:

And of course, these stutterers are like leftists, everywhere: they make a career out of evoking sympathy in others. Poor things. Innocent victims. Needy and helpless. There, there… When really, a millimeter beneath the surface appearance, lurks a vicious, ravening monster that knows no mercy, no love, no forgiveness, no quarter, and absolutely no capacity for fun.

I wish I was a victim. Has it’s perks, no?

1 Comment

Posted by on April 12, 2012 in Uncategorized


Why I Shall Be Forever Indebted to Our President and Fearless Leader Barack Hussein Obama

1. Thanks to His Greatness, I am now well-versed in the realities of race. He has illuminated the way to Steve Sailer.

2. He helped me understand how democracy really works and made me realize why Monarchy is the superior form of government. If it weren’t for him, I would have never realized how stupid the Crowd truly is.

Thank you, Mr. President. I shall always be grateful for the way you have enlightened me, a mere serf.



Father Knows Best: First Edition

Bruce Charlton: What Should We Call ‘Liberal Christians’? Unbelieving.

“I’m not doing that”

Can the media defeat the media?

Patrick J. Buchanan: Land of the Setting Sun

Is the GOP Becoming a War Party

Scott P. Richert: The Heart of Darkness

Aaron D. Wolf: Dreams of My Daughters

Srdja Trifkovic: Putin’s Victory

Thomas Fleming: Afghan Justice

Gerry T. Neal: The Folly of Feminism

Ulysses: Jefferson’s Wall

This Brave Young Woman Who Just Wandered Off the Street, Who We’ve Never Seen, and Who Definitely Doesn’t Have Any Heavy Weight Connections to the Democratic Party

Steve Sailer: As Affirmative Action Eligible As We Wish to Be

Proph: Should Cafeteria Catholics Apostasize?

James Kalb: God and Liberal Modernity

Kristor: Naming our Adversary

Morality is the Source of Biology(and Physics too)

Svein Sellanraa: Liberalism as Power-Madness

Elusive Wapiti: Failure to Launch

Bonald: On Natural Law: Desires and Goods

The Catholic Knight: A Southern (Dixie) Take on Monarchy

Catholics Win Deep South!!


Posted by on March 21, 2012 in Linklove


Special Snowflakes

Over at Dalrock’s, Deti listed this list of Feral Females:

1. The Carousel Rider. (The “carousel”, aka the “alpha c*ck carousel or the “c*ck carousel” describes a phenomenon in which women actively seek out and have sex with the alpha males in a community. This is a creation of the current sexual marketplace and resulted from completely unrestrained female sexual conduct. It inevitably leads to a situation in which anywhere from 30% to 80% of the women are sleeping with at most the top 20% of the men. These women are sharing the top men for sex. Each “gets a chance to ride all the horses on the carousel”, hence the name and imagery.)

The carousel rider has a high sex partner count from years of carousel riding but now wants to “settle down” with a “nice guy who will treat me right” because she’s “not like that anymore”. She’s around age 30, never married, and essentially wants off the carousel or got kicked off because she’s too old or no longer attractive enough.

2. The attention whore: She’s the stereotypical party girl. She’s loud, aggressive and drinks a lot. She dances on tables at the bar. Her Facebook page has hundreds of pictures and she is in nearly every one of them, usually holding a drink or making the “duckface” pose.

3. The status whore: She is obsessed with her status and that of others. She name drops famous or notorious people she has met, she knows, her friends know, or whom she has worked with. Owns expensive clothes, shoes or accessories and will tell anyone who will listen where she bought them and how much she (or her dad or a previous BF) paid for them. The quintessential status whore accessories: Manolo Blahnik shoes. The designer handbag, esp. Louis Vuitton or Gucci.

4. The entitlement princess: Very common female subtype. Accustomed to special treatment wherever she is. Makes increasingly heavy demands on her boyfriend’s time and money. Demands expensive and elaborate nights out including drinks, dinners, entertainment; then escalating to all-expense-paid vacations. Withholds sex when deprived of what she believes is her just due.

5. Batshit crazy: She has a diagnosable mental disorder, usually depression, bipolar disorder, borderline personality or sociopathy. She might also have one or more addictions. She hooks the man through rapid sexual escalation and universal sexual availability. Wildly unpredictable, sexually aggressive and susceptible to extreme mood swings — from loving and gift-giving to physical violence. This type must be avoided at all cost.

6. Special snowflake: There’s no one like her. She’s different and not like those other girls. Other girls are sluts and bitches; but she is kind and pure as the driven snow. Sure, she slept around, but she’s better because she didn’t do that as much, or with scummy guys, or have one night stands. Besides, she was just being true to herself.

7. Needy clingy: Starts out with rapid sexual escalation and all seems well. A few weeks or months in, her personality shifts from cheerful and kind to dark and insecure. She wants her BF’s constant attention. Anything less brings anger, constant phone calls, and accusations of cheating. She has few friends.

8. Career first girls: She’s a member of the feminist sisterhood. She’s working hard to break that glass ceiling — not just for herself, but for the sisterhood and all of humanity. A husband, children, and a family life will always come second to the job.

9. Single/divorced moms (sorry Dawn, have to include this): She hates her ex husband and is constantly fighting with him over visitation, alimony and child support. Her children are poorly behaved and insolent. She has a lot of financial problems. She is usually desperate for a man to rescue her. She might even entrap her BF by getting pregnant by him (or another man).

The girls I come across are about my age so they are pretty young therefore some of these types do not apply to men my age(Career Firsters and Single/Divorced Moms). I have met the Attention Whore, Needy-Clingy, the Entitlement Princess, Batshit Crazy(heh), and loads upon loads of Special Snowflakes. Of these 9, I would say that the hardest to figure out would be the Special Snowflake or Fly-by-Nighter(as described by MOSES Nicholas). Special Snowflakes/Fly-By-Nighters tend to be especially hard to discern them because while they, like the rest, are very dysfunctional, they also tend to be very feminine and girly. That makes them hard to figure out and in many cases, not until it’s too late:

The Fly-By-Nighter:

This type has certain notions of romance and beauty that go beyond those of the Material Girl, but rather than seek out the larger significance she stays stuck on the superficial romantic trappings. If she enters into a marriage, her motivation is probably not simply to “look good” to others, but once the internal luster has worn off she will start looking elsewhere for romantic satisfaction. She will pursue this romantic satisfaction even at the expense of her children, if she has any. She will not be above abandoning her husband and even kids for good for another “hot new model.

The question is, how do you figure her out before it’s too late? Reading MOSES Nicholas’s description of the kind of man that the Special Snowflake/Fly-By-Nighter usually ends up with is rather unsettling:

The Fly-By-Nighter may actually end up with a decent, respect-worthy man. This is because she seeks qualities that good people tend to admire and try to cultivate, even though she does not understand the deeper goodness of character and intellect that animates those qualities. The decent man may easily fall victim if he has grown up in a wholesome, tight-knit community of family and friends where he was not the one who had to watch out for the kind of company he and his siblings were keeping; as such, he may neglect to fully observe and apprehend the superficiality of his charmed and sentimental woman until it is too late.


Posted by on March 18, 2012 in feral females, The Decline


Sandra Fluke Controversy: A Well-Planned DNC Attack on Rome

Bill Sardi:

How much of a charade was the Sandra Fluke “affair?” To refresh a current controversy, a 30-year-old Georgetown University law student became infamous for 15 minutes when radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh called her a “slut” for demanding a Catholic university provide free birth control to poor women. But was that the bigger issue?

There were many charades going on when Sandra Fluke came into the public limelight.

First we had a Democratic Party committee meeting that was made up to look like a Congressional hearing.

Then we had a radio talk show host whose popularity is waning who wanted to put himself at the center of a political argument. He was reveling at the height of the imaginary controversy.

Then we had a Georgetown University student who is really a political activist who appears to have been planted at that university to undermine the Catholic church’s moral teachings by creating the false argument that poor women attending school there (how can you be poor and pay that tuition?) have to pay as much as $3000 during their college years for contraception (actually $9/month birth control pills are widely available and I think Planned Parenthood offers them at no charge for poor women).

Then we have a President who somehow catches wind of all this, and in between World War III breaking out in Iran, the world economies collapsing, starting with a failed bailout of Greece, and $5 gasoline prices, he has time to call Sandra Fluke and offer his support.

Looks like our Circus Clown-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama has his priorities in check! Europe’s going to shit, Bibi is breathing down his neck, gas is going up, but put all that on hold! Some VD-laden feminist sluut got her feelings offended. Oh and she happens to be the main pawn in the Kulturkampf against Rome.

To learn more about how Democracy (doesn’t)work, read the rest over here:


Posted by on March 12, 2012 in America, Brave New World Order, The Kulturkampf



(h/t Alte)

Looks like the Ess Pee Ell Cee is at again!:

This is the same Ess Pee Ell Cee that slanders good men like Thomas Fleming and Pat Buchanan. While the list provided does have some unsavory sites, it does post some sites that are on our blogroll like Alcuin and The CounterFeminist.

Keep your identities well hidden. That’s all I say. They’ll assassinate your character. If you live in Amerika and you have a job to worry about, I highly recommend that you obscure your identity. If you live Canada you should obscure your identity anyway due to your draconian hate laws.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 278 other followers