I found this recently via a link at the Onion. It is rip-roaringly funny, written In the dark ages before Roissy’s blog had been around for at least a year.
Some choice excerpts:
“All the feminist movement needed to do was bring on someone who had the balls to do something about this glass ceiling business,” said McGowan
McGowan claimed that one of the main reasons the movement enjoyed so little success in the past was that the previous management was often too timid and passive and should have been much more results-focused.”You can’t waste time pussyfooting around with protests and getting all emotional about a bunch of irrelevant details,” McGowan said. “If you want to enjoy equal rights, you have to have a real man-to-man chat with the people in charge until you can hammer out some more equitable custody laws.”
“With a charismatic, self-assured guy like Pete pulling the strings, we might even see a female elected president one of these days,” said Nathan Roth, an analyst at the Cato Institute. “Finally, the feminist movement has a face that commands respect.”
All kidding aside, the article does bring up a critical point often cited in the Manosphere. The effects of Feminism have been so damaging to what women have really wanted (husband, children, family) that it must have taken a man to come up with it. As Hawaiian Libertarian has pointed out a few times, that man was probably named Rockefeller.